HomeDirect TaxFinance Bill 2025: Government Amends Definition of 'Capital Asset'

Finance Bill 2025: Government Amends Definition of ‘Capital Asset’

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Finance Bill 2025 has introduced a significant amendment to the definition of “capital asset” under Section 2(14) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This amendment brings securities held by investment funds under the capital asset category, specifically targeting Category I and Category II Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) regulated under the SEBI (AIF) Regulations, 2012.

This amendment aims to streamline the taxation framework for AIFs, ensuring clarity in the tax treatment of securities held by these funds. By recognizing such securities as capital assets, the government seeks to provide uniformity in taxation and enhance transparency in investment structures.

Government Amendment Further Expands Scope

A subsequent Government Amendment to the Finance Bill 2025 has further broadened the definition of “capital asset.” The latest revision now includes securities held by Category I or Category II AIFs where investments have been made in compliance with either the SEBI regulations or the International Financial Services Centres Authority (IFSCA) regulations. This expansion aims to provide greater flexibility to AIFs operating within India and offshore financial centers, thereby aligning tax provisions with the evolving regulatory landscape.

Read More: Government Expands Tax Exemptions for Non-Residents in IFSC under Section 10(4E) of Income Tax Act

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

CESTAT Quashes Excise Duty Demand on Poultry Cage Weld Mesh

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Commission Retained on Air Tickets Bought Through GSA/IATA Agents Not Taxable as Business Auxiliary Service

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

CENVAT Credit Can’t Be Denied on Duty-Paid Inputs from Area-Based Exempt Units: CESTAT

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Ignoring Taxpayer’s Reply While Rejecting GST Refund Is Illegal: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has set aside an ex-parte order rejecting a GST refund...

More like this

CESTAT Quashes Excise Duty Demand on Poultry Cage Weld Mesh

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Commission Retained on Air Tickets Bought Through GSA/IATA Agents Not Taxable as Business Auxiliary Service

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

CENVAT Credit Can’t Be Denied on Duty-Paid Inputs from Area-Based Exempt Units: CESTAT

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...