Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGST18% GST Applicable On Aluminium Composite Panel/Sheets: AAAR

18% GST Applicable On Aluminium Composite Panel/Sheets: AAAR

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Telangana Appellate Authority of Advance Ruling (AAAR) has ruled that Aluminium Composite Panel/Sheets are classifiable under Heading 7606 and 18% GST is applicable.

The bench of Sandeep Prakash and S.A.M. Rizvi while upholding the AAR’s order observed that Aluminium Composite Panel/Sheets is neither plastic nor aluminium wholly and as such cannot be classified either as plastic or aluminium based on materials it contains and as such, subject goods do not fall under any of the Tariff Headings 3920 or 7604 or 7610. However, the ruling of State Member is otherwise silent on classification of subiect goods. On the other hand, the Central Member has held that goods are classifiable under Tariff Heading 7606 as per Rule 3(b) of the General Rules for the Interpretation of the Customs Import Tariff. Both the Members have expressed uniform opinion with regard to the applicability of rate of tax, i.e., 18%.

The applicant, M/s. Aludecor Lamination Private Limited is engaged in manufacturing of Aluminium Composite Panel/Sheet, (ACP Sheets). In common parlance the product of the applicant is called as “Aluminium Composite Panel”, often it is called as “Sandwich Panel” or “ACP Sheet”. It is used by Railways in coach building and also other purposes by commercial buildings as outside walls for protection from heat, advertisement boards, construction of pedestrian bridges, etc.

The applicant sought the advance ruling on the issue of whether the Aluminium Composite Panel/Sheet is covered under HSN 3920 or HSN 7610 or HSN 7606.

The Central Member has examined the matter in detail, in line with rules for interpretation of tariff and various case laws. It has been brought out that the rates of GST are specified as per “tariff item”, “sub-heading”, “heading”, and “chapter” mentioned in the schedules to the relevant notifications, which are as specified in the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. 

It is also specified that the rules of interpretation of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act shall also apply to the interpretation of these notifications. The Central Member has applied Rule 3(b) of the General Rules for Interpretation of Tariff to hold that the subject goods would fall under Chapter 76, since essential character in respect of the ACPs is given by Aluminium. The Central Member has thereafter ruled out the contending Heading 7610 as the subject goods are not Aluminium structures and parts of structures. Thereafter, following the decision of CESTAT in the case of Commissioner of Customs (Imports) Chennai Vs ICP India Pvt. Ltd. {2018(7) TMI 546-CESTAT Chennai), the Central Member has held the goods to be classifiable under Heading 7606.

The AAR upheld the view taken by the Central Member in the Order and ruled that the Aluminium Composite Panel/Sheets are classifiable under Heading 7606.

Ruling Details

Applicant Name:  M/s. Aludecor Lamination Private Limited

Date: 20/02/2025

Read More: Govt Promotes B.A.V. Srinivasa Rao, Lalit Prasad, Ranjit Kumar, Nasim Arshi, Yashodhan Arvind Wanage, and M.G. Thamizh Valavan to Principal Commissioner of Customs &…

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Notice Issued Before Filing of Return Cannot Sustain Reassessment: ITAT Quashes Rs. 2 Crore Cash Credit Addition

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed reassessment proceedings...

ITO Can’t Reassess Non-Corporate Taxpayer Beyond CBDT’s Pecuniary Limit: ITAT Quashes Rs. 14-Crore Addition

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed reassessment proceedings...

FSSAI Registration Can’t Replace Regular Licence for Large-Scale Slaughterhouse Operations: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has held that an FSSAI registration certificate issued to a...

Full Payment of Disputed GST Demand Cannot Block Statutory Appeal: Allahabad High Court Directs Portal Access

The Allahabad High Court has held that a taxpayer’s statutory right to appeal cannot...

More like this

Notice Issued Before Filing of Return Cannot Sustain Reassessment: ITAT Quashes Rs. 2 Crore Cash Credit Addition

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed reassessment proceedings...

ITO Can’t Reassess Non-Corporate Taxpayer Beyond CBDT’s Pecuniary Limit: ITAT Quashes Rs. 14-Crore Addition

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed reassessment proceedings...

FSSAI Registration Can’t Replace Regular Licence for Large-Scale Slaughterhouse Operations: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has held that an FSSAI registration certificate issued to a...