HomeGSTChhattisgarh High Court Directs PWD To Process GST Refund Claim Collected In...

Chhattisgarh High Court Directs PWD To Process GST Refund Claim Collected In Course Of Execution Of Contract Awarded Prior To GST Regime

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Chhattisgarh High Court has directed the Public Works Department (PWD) to process GST refund claims collected in the course of execution of contracts awarded prior to the GST regime.

The bench of Justice Bibhu Datta Guru has directed the department Authorities to immediately process the claim of the petitioner so far as the refund of GST is concerned, after the due verification of facts and also the entitlement part of the petitioner is concerned. 

The whole grievance of the petitioner is the inaction on the part of the respondents in not refunding the amount of GST collected from the petitioner in the course of execution of the contract that was awarded to the petitioner.

According to the petitioner, the contract was awarded prior to GST regime & GST by the Government from 01.07.2017 during the execution of the works contract.

The grievance of the petitioner is that in spite of repeated approach being made to the respondents, there is a total inaction on the part of the respondents so far as the refund of GST is concerned.

The department respondents submitted that subject to verification of facts, the claim of the petitioner shall be decided at the earliest.

The court directed that an appropriate decision be taken within an outer limit of 90 days.

Case Details

Case Title: M/s B.K. Chawla Versus State Of Chhattisgarh 

Case No.: WPC No. 676 of 2025

Date: 03.02.2025

Counsel For Petitioner: K.P.S. Gandhi, Advocate

Counsel For Respondent: Praveen Das, Addl. Advocate General

Read More: Customs Duty Evasion Worth Rs. 25.6 Crores By Undervaluing Walnut Imports | Surat Businessmen Under DRI’s Custody For 2 Days

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT 

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has set aside...

Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

Credit Can’t Be Denied Repair And Maintenance Services Of Plant And Machinery By Categorising As Work Contract: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC

The Tripura High Court has held that mere uploading of an adjudication order on...

More like this

Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT 

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has set aside...

Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

Credit Can’t Be Denied Repair And Maintenance Services Of Plant And Machinery By Categorising As Work Contract: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...