Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationDelhi Development Authority Can’t Be Treated As Local Authority Under GST law,...

Delhi Development Authority Can’t Be Treated As Local Authority Under GST law, Clarifies FinMin

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Finance Ministry has clarified that Delhi Development Authority (DDA) cannot be treated as local authority under GST law.

It was clarified that DDA does not meet the requirement of local authority as per section 2(69) of the CGST Act, 2017. Thus, as recommended by the 55th GST Council, it is hereby clarified that DDA cannot be treated as local authority under GST law.

Representation has been received from DDA seeking clarification whether DDA is a ‘local authority’ as per section 2(69) of CGST Act, 2017.

As per entry at Sr. No. 5 of notification No. 13/2017-CTR dated 28.06.2017, services supplied by local authority to a business entity are taxable on Reverse Charge (RCM) basis.

Local authority under section 2(69) of the CGST Act, 2017 has been defined as a “Municipal Committee, a Zilla Parishad, a District Board, and any other authority legally entitled to, or entrusted by the Central Government or any State Government with the control or management of a municipal or local fund”

It means an authority which is similar to the elected self-governing body such as Municipal Committee and which is entrusted with the control and management of municipal or local fund can be termed as local authority.

Circular No. 245/02/2025-GST

Date: 28/01/2025

Click Here To Read Circular

Read More: GST Applicable On Services Provided By Facility Management Agency To Municipal Corporation Of Delhi Headquarters, Clarifies FinMin

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

‘On-Money’ Addition Deleted As Third-Party Excel Sheet Failed To Establish Undisclosed Payment: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has deleted an addition of ₹2.5 crore...

2 Flats Merged Into 1 Home Qualify For Capital Gains Exemption: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has upheld capital gains exemptions totalling ₹28.45...

Dealer Incentives Can’t Be Taxed Merely on Ledger Entries: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has set aside a...

Customs Interest Can’t Be Backdated Before Confiscation Liability Is Determined; Nearly 8 Year Period Excluded: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has held that interest arising from customs confiscation and redemption...

More like this

‘On-Money’ Addition Deleted As Third-Party Excel Sheet Failed To Establish Undisclosed Payment: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has deleted an addition of ₹2.5 crore...

2 Flats Merged Into 1 Home Qualify For Capital Gains Exemption: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has upheld capital gains exemptions totalling ₹28.45...

Dealer Incentives Can’t Be Taxed Merely on Ledger Entries: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has set aside a...