HomeGST55th GST Council Meet:  18% GST On Caramel Popcorn, 5% GST On...

55th GST Council Meet:  18% GST On Caramel Popcorn, 5% GST On Salted Ones

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The 55th GST Council met under the Chairpersonship of Union Minister for Finance & Corporate Affairs Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman in Jaisalmer, Rajasthan, today. 

The council has recommended that ready to eat popcorn which is mixed with salt and spices are classifiable under HS 2106 90 99 and attracts 5% GST if supplied as other than pre-packaged and labelled and 12% GST if supplied as pre-packaged and labelled. 

However, when popcorn is mixed with sugar thereby changing its character to sugar confectionery (e.g. caramel popcorn), it would be classifiable under HS 1704 90 90 and attract 18% GST. It has been decided to regularise the issues for the past on “as is where is” basis.

It is worthwhile to note that there is no new imposition of any tax in this regard and is merely a clarification as certain field units were demanding different tax rates on the same. Therefore, it is a clarification being recommended by the GST Council to settle the disputes arising out of interpretation.)

Read More: 55th GST Council Meet: No GST On Transaction Less Than Rs. 2k Via Payment Aggregators

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

3-Month Timeline for Pronouncing Reserved Judgments: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that justice delayed at the judgment stage violates Article...

Approver Evidence Need Not Be Corroborated in Every Detail: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has upheld the conviction of an accused in a 1984 double...

S. 54 Deduction Can’t Be Restricted Merely Because New House Is Purchased Jointly With Spouse: ITAT

The Chandigarh Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that an...

Survey Disclosure Can’t Be Reclassified as Se. 69A Income Through Rectification U/s 154: ITAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that income...

More like this

3-Month Timeline for Pronouncing Reserved Judgments: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that justice delayed at the judgment stage violates Article...

Approver Evidence Need Not Be Corroborated in Every Detail: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has upheld the conviction of an accused in a 1984 double...

S. 54 Deduction Can’t Be Restricted Merely Because New House Is Purchased Jointly With Spouse: ITAT

The Chandigarh Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that an...