GST Dept. Can’t Initiate Fresh Adjudication Proceedings On Issues Already Decided By Appellate Authority: Orissa High Court

Ask Jurishour AI

HomeGSTGST Dept. Can’t Initiate Fresh Adjudication Proceedings On Issues Already Decided By...

GST Dept. Can’t Initiate Fresh Adjudication Proceedings On Issues Already Decided By Appellate Authority: Orissa High Court

GST

Published on

23/12/2025

By Mariya Paliwala

GST Dept. Can’t Initiate Fresh Adjudication Proceedings On Issues Already Decided By Appellate Authority: Orissa High Court

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Orissa High Court has quashed a demand-cum-show cause notice issued to Auroglobal Comtrade Pvt. Ltd., holding that the Goods and Service Tax (GST) department cannot initiate fresh adjudication proceedings on issues already decided by the appellate authority. The bench of Chief Justice Harish Tandon and Justice Murahari Sri Raman held that the initiation of…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Ask Jurishour AI

GST Dept. Can’t Initiate Fresh Adjudication Proceedings On Issues Already Decided By Appellate Authority: Orissa High Court

Membership Required

Latest articles

S. 80P(4) No Bar to Deduction on Interest Earned From Co-operative Bank: ITAT

Dept. Can’t Fully Disbelieve Hospital’s Higher Cash Receipts During Demonetisation: ITAT Restricts Rs. 1.80 Crore Addition to Rs. 5 Lakh

GSTAT Admits ITC Dispute Over Alleged Retrospective Application of Section 16(2)(c) Amendment, Says Appeal Raises “Pure Question of Law”

Failure to Reverse ITC on Exempt Electricity Supply, Alleged Suppression U/S 74: GSTAT Admits Dept.’s Appeal

More like this

S. 80P(4) No Bar to Deduction on Interest Earned From Co-operative Bank: ITAT

Dept. Can’t Fully Disbelieve Hospital’s Higher Cash Receipts During Demonetisation: ITAT Restricts Rs. 1.80 Crore Addition to Rs. 5 Lakh

GSTAT Admits ITC Dispute Over Alleged Retrospective Application of Section 16(2)(c) Amendment, Says Appeal Raises “Pure Question of Law”

About us

Company

Categories