HomeOther LawsDestruction Of Government Property At Collectorate Office : CBI Court Sentences Three...

Destruction Of Government Property At Collectorate Office : CBI Court Sentences Three Accused Advocates

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The CBI court has sentenced three accused advocates for destructing government property at the Collectorate Office.

The Court of Special Judicial Magistrate, CBI cases, Lucknow sentenced three accused advocates namely Shri Sunil Tondon, Shri Dharmendra Mishra and Shri Sunil Bajpai to one year’s Imprisonment with total fine of Rs. 7,500/- in a case related to destruction of government property at Collectorate Office, Etawah (UP) and causing hurt to Govt. servants by unruly behaviors on 15.09.2000.

CBI registered the instant case, on the basis of an order of the Allahabad High Court passed in Crl. Misc. (PIL), by taking over investigation of case crime no. 303/2000 of PS Civil Lines, Etawah (UP).

After investigation, CBI filed charge-sheet on 28.06.2011 against accused Veerendra Singh Yadav, Avneesh Chauhan, Sunil Tandon, Sunil Bajpai and Dharmendra Mishra u/s 143, 147, 323 r/w 149 and 332 of IPC and against Veerendra Singh Yadav  u/s 153 IPC also.

During trial 2 accused Avneesh Chauhan and Veerendra Yadav died and proceedings against them were abated.

After trial, the Court found the remaining accused guilty and sentenced them accordingly.

Click Here To Read Press Release

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

HC Can’t Force Plaintiff to Accept Compensation Instead of Encroachment Removal: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that the High Court cannot force the plaintiff to...

Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court 

The Karnataka High Court has set aside a GST adjudication order after observing that...

WhatsApp Chats Alone Can’t Justify Tax Additions: ITAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted multiple additions...

Recorded Jewellery Sales Can’t Be Treated as Unexplained Cash: ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that where...

More like this

HC Can’t Force Plaintiff to Accept Compensation Instead of Encroachment Removal: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that the High Court cannot force the plaintiff to...

Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court 

The Karnataka High Court has set aside a GST adjudication order after observing that...

WhatsApp Chats Alone Can’t Justify Tax Additions: ITAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted multiple additions...