Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsDestruction Of Government Property At Collectorate Office : CBI Court Sentences Three...

Destruction Of Government Property At Collectorate Office : CBI Court Sentences Three Accused Advocates

Other LawsBreaking

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Destruction Of Government Property At Collectorate Office : CBI Court Sentences Three Accused Advocates

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The CBI court has sentenced three accused advocates for destructing government property at the Collectorate Office.

The Court of Special Judicial Magistrate, CBI cases, Lucknow sentenced three accused advocates namely Shri Sunil Tondon, Shri Dharmendra Mishra and Shri Sunil Bajpai to one year’s Imprisonment with total fine of Rs. 7,500/- in a case related to destruction of government property at Collectorate Office, Etawah (UP) and causing hurt to Govt. servants by unruly behaviors on 15.09.2000.

CBI registered the instant case, on the basis of an order of the Allahabad High Court passed in Crl. Misc. (PIL), by taking over investigation of case crime no. 303/2000 of PS Civil Lines, Etawah (UP).

After investigation, CBI filed charge-sheet on 28.06.2011 against accused Veerendra Singh Yadav, Avneesh Chauhan, Sunil Tandon, Sunil Bajpai and Dharmendra Mishra u/s 143, 147, 323 r/w 149 and 332 of IPC and against Veerendra Singh Yadav  u/s 153 IPC also.

During trial 2 accused Avneesh Chauhan and Veerendra Yadav died and proceedings against them were abated.

After trial, the Court found the remaining accused guilty and sentenced them accordingly.

Click Here To Read Press Release

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST

GST Penalty Can’t Rest on Driver’s Uncorroborated Statement When Iron Scrap Matches Valid Documents: GSTAT

The GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Lucknow Bench, has dismissed a departmental appeal seeking restoration...
GST

Accountant’s Absence Delayed Stock Entries: GSTAT Rejects Dept.’s Plea for Confiscation

The GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Lucknow Bench, has dismissed a departmental appeal against relief...
Notification

GST Registration Can’t Be Denied Merely Because Business Operates From Residential Premises: CBIC

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has directed GST officers not...
Direct Tax

Irrigation Certificate and Electricity Bills Prove Agricultural Income: ITAT Deletes Unexplained Investment Addition

The Jaipur Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted an addition...

More like this

GST

GST Penalty Can’t Rest on Driver’s Uncorroborated Statement When Iron Scrap Matches Valid Documents: GSTAT

The GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Lucknow Bench, has dismissed a departmental appeal seeking restoration...
GST

Accountant’s Absence Delayed Stock Entries: GSTAT Rejects Dept.’s Plea for Confiscation

The GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Lucknow Bench, has dismissed a departmental appeal against relief...
Notification

GST Registration Can’t Be Denied Merely Because Business Operates From Residential Premises: CBIC

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has directed GST officers not...