Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesTaxability Of Performance Linked Incentives Covered Under Rare Case : Bombay High...

Taxability Of Performance Linked Incentives Covered Under Rare Case : Bombay High Court Waives Pre-Deposit

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bombay High Court has waived the pre-deposit considering the fact that taxability performance linked incentives/commission covered under rare cases.

The bench of Justice M.S. Sonak and Justice Jitendra Jain has observed that the petitioner appears to have a strong prima facie case and that the test of “likelihood of success” is liable to be answered in its favour.

The statute no longer confers any discretion on the first appellate authority or the CESTAT to waive the condition of pre-deposit. It is in the backdrop that the writ petitioner has approached the Court under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944  to submit that this is one of those rare and deserving cases where the Court would be justified in invoking its jurisdiction conferred by Article 226 of the Constitution.

The principal demand appears to have come to be created by virtue of certain incentive payments which were received by the petitioner in connection with the use of the Computer Reservation System and which enabled it to access the online computer booking network.

The petitioner while assailing the view taken by the Adjudicating Authority in this respect, however, had relied upon the judgment rendered by a Larger Bench of the CESTAT in Kafila Hospitality & Travels Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commr. Of S.T., Delhi

In Kafila Hospitality case, the central issue which arose for consideration was whether the use of the Central Reservation System created by companies by approved agents of the International Air Ticketing Association [IATA] could be classified as a business auxiliary service and thus exigible to tax. It was held that commissions are leviable to service tax inasmuch as the commission received by the air travel agent from the airlines/IATA agent has to be included in the value of the taxable service provided by the air travel agent under rule 6(1)(iv) of the Service tax (Determination of Value Rules, 2006.

The court while dealing with the ambit of Section 35F as well as situations where Courts would be justified in intervening and dispensing with a condition of pre-deposit had directly arisen for consideration in Ajay Sagar vs Principal Commissioner of Customs (Imports).

The court held that the issue of taxability of performance linked incentives qualify the test of rare and exceptional cases and pre-deposit shall stand waived.

Read More: Erroneous Interpretation Of Foreign Trade Policy : Delhi High Court Issues Notice To DGFT

Case Details

Case Title: Just Click Travels Private Limited Versus UOI

Case No.: W.P.(C) 8896/2023

Date: 09.12.2024

Counsel For Appellant: Sr. Adv Sanjeev Anand

Counsel For Respondent: Bhagvan Swarup Shukla

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Personal Customs Penalty Proceedings Against Company Director Abate After His Death: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has declared that customs penalty proceedings initiated against a company...

GST Order Passed Without Hearing Quashed: Madras High Court 

The Madras High Court has set aside a GST assessment order passed under Section...

CBIC Cuts EMI Scheme Paperwork From 10 Documents to 3 to Boost MSME Participation

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has substantially reduced the documentation...

PIL In Supreme Court Challenges MDR On UPI Payments Above Rs. 2,000; Stay Sought On October 15 Rollout

A Public Interest Litigation has been filed before the Supreme Court challenging the Centre’s...

More like this

Personal Customs Penalty Proceedings Against Company Director Abate After His Death: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has declared that customs penalty proceedings initiated against a company...

GST Order Passed Without Hearing Quashed: Madras High Court 

The Madras High Court has set aside a GST assessment order passed under Section...

CBIC Cuts EMI Scheme Paperwork From 10 Documents to 3 to Boost MSME Participation

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has substantially reduced the documentation...