Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTProvisional Acknowledgement Receipt Generated On GST Portal; Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed Alleging...

Provisional Acknowledgement Receipt Generated On GST Portal; Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed Alleging Non-Payment Of Pre-Deposit : Bombay High court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bombay High Court has held that appeal cannot be dismissed alleging non-payment of pre-deposit when provisional acknowledgement receipt generated on GST portal.

The bench of Justice M.S. Sonak and Justice Jitendra Jain has observed that in the memorandum of appeal, the amount of pre-deposit paid has been specified under S.No.15 of Form APL-01. The Petition has the screenshots of the Electronic Credit Ledger, and the Electronic Cash Ledger of the Petitioner downloaded from the GSTN portal. The document shows that the Petitioner has made a payment of Rs. 3,20,22,340 from the Electronic Credit Ledger and a payment of Rs. 1,22,33,134/- from the Electronic Cash Ledger. 

The bench noted that the Petition contained the system- generated provisional acknowledgement of the appeal, which is generated automatically by the Respondents’ portal once an assessee files an appeal. This acknowledgement itself shows that the requisite pre-deposit has been made. 

The Petitioner has claimed that they had paid a pre- deposit Amount of Rs. 4,42,55,474/- (10% of the disputed tax amount) when filing their appeal before the department.

In the memorandum of appeal i.e., Form APL-01 itself, the amount of pre-deposit paid has been specified under S.No.15 of Form APL-01. Further, Exhibit of the Petition are screenshots of the Electronic Credit Ledger, and the Electronic Cash Ledger of the Petitioner downloaded from the GSTN portal. This document shows that the Petitioner has made a payment of Rs. 3,20,22,340/- from the Electronic Credit Ledger on 12.03.2024 and a payment of Rs. 1,22,33,134/- from the Electronic Cash Ledger on 12.03.2024 totalling to Rs. 4,42,55,474/-. 

Exhibit  to the Petition is the system-generated provisional acknowledgement of the appeal, which is generated automatically by the Respondents’ portal once an assessee files an appeal. This acknowledgement itself shows that the requisite pre-deposit has been made. Hence, the Petitioner had complied with the necessary pre-deposit required in Section 107(6) of the CGST Act.

The court held that the Petitioner had complied with the necessary pre-deposit required in Section 107(6) of the CGST Act.

What is  Section 107(6) of the CGST Act?

Section 107(6) of the CGST Act states that no appeal shall be filed, unless the appellant has paid in full, such part of the amount of tax, interest, fine, fee and penalty arising from the impugned order, as is admitted by him; and a sum equal to ten per cent. of the remaining amount of tax in dispute arising from the said order, [subject to a maximum of twenty-five crore rupees,] [Inserted by Act No. 31 of 2018, dated 29.8.2018.]in relation to which the appeal has been filed.

Case Details

Case Title:  Delphi World Money Ltd. Versus The Union of India

Case No.: Writ Petition (L) No. 28914 Of 2024

Date:  11 November 2024

Counsel For Petitioner: Sriram Sridharan

Counsel For Respondent: Karan Adik

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

FREEDOM SUPREME – 2026 INSC 1195 – SRI SUJIT DAS AND ORS. ETC. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA

This Article pertaining to FREEDOM SUPREME – 2026 INSC 1195 - SRI SUJIT DAS...

GST Notice Despite Advance Ruling: Gujarat High Court Restrains Final Order Without Its Permission

The Gujarat High Court has granted ad-interim protection to a company challenging proceedings under...

GST Demand Based On Return Scrutiny Requires Prior ASMT-10 Notice: Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court has set aside a GST demand proceeding involving alleged under-declaration...

Govt. Funding Doesn’t Establish Eligibility For 12% GST On Spinning Mill Construction: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Pune Bench, has upheld 18% GST...

More like this

FREEDOM SUPREME – 2026 INSC 1195 – SRI SUJIT DAS AND ORS. ETC. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA

This Article pertaining to FREEDOM SUPREME – 2026 INSC 1195 - SRI SUJIT DAS...

GST Notice Despite Advance Ruling: Gujarat High Court Restrains Final Order Without Its Permission

The Gujarat High Court has granted ad-interim protection to a company challenging proceedings under...

GST Demand Based On Return Scrutiny Requires Prior ASMT-10 Notice: Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court has set aside a GST demand proceeding involving alleged under-declaration...