Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTE-Way Bill and GSTR-3B Mismatch| Allahabad High Court Stays Rs. 142 Crore...

E-Way Bill and GSTR-3B Mismatch| Allahabad High Court Stays Rs. 142 Crore GST Demand Against Oppo Mobiles 

GST

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
E-Way Bill and GSTR-3B Mismatch| Allahabad High Court Stays Rs. 142 Crore GST Demand Against Oppo Mobiles

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Allahabad High Court has granted interim relief to a taxpayer in a significant Goods and Services Tax (GST) dispute involving a demand of nearly ₹142 Crores raised under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) on the basis of alleged mismatch between e-way bill data and GSTR-3B returns…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST

3 Days’ Notice Insufficient to Block GST ITC: Karnataka High Court Orders Release of Rs. 43.89 Lakh Credit

The Karnataka High Court has set aside an order blocking input tax credit (ITC)...
Columns

14 GST Changes From 1 November 2026

Businesses across hospitality, transport, e-commerce, agriculture and recycling will need to review their GST...
Direct Tax

Search-Based Income Tax Reassessment Must Follow S. 153C, Not S. 147: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Kolkata Bench, has held that reassessment proceedings founded...
Direct Tax

Dept. Can’t Challenge CIT(A)’s Jurisdiction After Dept. Allocates Appeal And AO Raises No Objection: ITAT

The Pune Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has dismissed the department’s...

More like this

GST

3 Days’ Notice Insufficient to Block GST ITC: Karnataka High Court Orders Release of Rs. 43.89 Lakh Credit

The Karnataka High Court has set aside an order blocking input tax credit (ITC)...
Columns

14 GST Changes From 1 November 2026

Businesses across hospitality, transport, e-commerce, agriculture and recycling will need to review their GST...
Direct Tax

Search-Based Income Tax Reassessment Must Follow S. 153C, Not S. 147: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Kolkata Bench, has held that reassessment proceedings founded...