GST On Royalty Paid By Mineral Concession Holder
GST On Royalty Paid By Mineral Concession Holder

The Himachal Pradesh High Court has upheld the GST on royalty paid by mineral concession holders for any mining concession granted by state.

The bench of Acting Chief Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan and Justice Satyen Vaidya has observed that the judgment rendered in India Cement Ltd.’s case has now been overruled by Nine-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Mineral Area Development Authority & anr. vs. M/s Steel Authority of India & anr. In which it has been held that royalty is not a tax. 

Background – GST on royalty paid by mineral concession holders

The petitioner/assessee has raised the issue whether there can be levy of GST on royalty paid by the mineral concession holder for any mining concession granted by the State.

The petitioner relied on the judgement rendered by Seven- Judge Bench of the Supreme Court in India Cement Ltd. and ors. vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors. In which it was declared that royalty itself is a tax.

Earlier the demand for GST on royalty by the respondents was stayed by the Division Bench of the Court.

Conclusion

The court upheld the notices and dismissed the petition of the assessee.

Read More: Electronic Credit Ledger Can’t Be Blocked Citing Enforcement Authority’s Reports: Karnataka High Court

Case Details

Case Title:  M/s Lakhwinder Singh Stone Crusher Versus Union of India & ors.

Case No.:  CWP No. 8637/2023

Date: 4.11.2024

Counsel For Petitioner: Arvind Sharma

Counsel For Respondent: Anup Rattan

Mariya Paliwala
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

FinMin Clarifies On Regularizing GST On Support Services Provided By An Electricity Transmission Or Distribution Utility

The Ministry of Finance has issued clarification regarding the regularizing payment of…

Safari Judgement Review Petition Filed By GST Dept. Dismissed: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has dismissed the review petition filed by the Goods…
No Orders Permissible Under Omitted Rule 96(10) of CGST Rules Post 8 October 2024: Uttarakhand High Court

No Orders Permissible Under Omitted Rule 96(10) of CGST Rules Post 8 October 2024: Uttarakhand High Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has held that no orders are permissible under…

GST Dept. To Communicate Grounds Of Arrest To Arrested Person: CBIC 

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has issued the…