Inadmissible GST ITC Claims By Creating Fake Companies: Jharkhand High Court Grants Bail To Accused
Inadmissible GST ITC Claims By Creating Fake Companies: Jharkhand High Court Grants Bail To Accused

The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to the accused citing inadmissible GST ITC claims by creating fake companies.

The court noted that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 09.04.2024, investigation has been completed and charge sheet has been submitted. Trial has yet to commence which shall consume considerable time. 

The bench observed that the relevant evidence of the case pertains to electronic evidence, which cannot be tampered by petitioner and other witnesses are official witnesses. 

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the nature of allegation against petitioner coupled with materials available on record and period of custody of the petitioner, the bench was inclined to release the petitioner, on bail. 

Facts 

The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Complaint Case registered under Sections 132 (1)(b) and 132 (1)(c) and 132 (5) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Special Court, Economic Offences, Jamshedpur. 

Read More: Whether GST Exemption Granted To Transmission/Distribution Of Electricity Would Take In Ancillary Services Offered To Its Consumers? Supreme Court Is Yet To Decide: Patna High Court

As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, being an individual, is involved in creating fake companies / firms and appointing Directors / Partners / Proprietors, which is further involved in fraudulently availing fake Input Tax Credit and further passing on the inadmissible Input Tax Credit and further passing on to the various fake firms leading to loss of more than Rs. 522.91 Crores to the Government Exchequer without actual supply of goods. 

Case Information 

Case Name: Amit Gupta V/S Union of India

Judicial Level & Location : High Court Of Jharkhand  

Case Number : B.A. No. 5472 of 2024

Date of Ruling : 18/07/2024

Ruling in favor of: Petitioner 

Judges: Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

Counsel for Petitioner: Adv Mr. Nitin Kumar Pasari

Counsel for Respondent: Mr. Parth S.A. Swaroop Pati, Sr. S.C., CGST Mr. Anurag Vijay, Jr. S.C., CGST

Download Judgment

Juris Hour Team
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Today Is The Last Day To Fulfil These GST Compliances

Meeting tax compliance deadlines is critical for businesses to avoid penalties and…

Principle Of Unjust Enrichment Does Not Apply To Refund Of Electronic Cash Ledger : Andhra Pradesh High Court

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has held that the principle of unjust…

GST Assistant Commissioner (Refund) Adopts Dual Standards, Resulting In Differential Tax Treatment To Similarly Placed Assesses : Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that the GST Assistant Commissioner (Refund)…
Delhi High Court Bars GST Dept from Invoking Extended Limitation Against Sub-Contractor Amid Service Tax Confusion

Delhi High Court Bars GST Dept from Invoking Extended Limitation Against Sub-Contractor Amid Service Tax Confusion

The Delhi High Court has barred the GST dept from invoking extended…