Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeDirect Tax‘Leave And Licence’ Or 'Rental Agreement' Doesn’t Change Colour Of Receipts; Delhi...

‘Leave And Licence’ Or ‘Rental Agreement’ Doesn’t Change Colour Of Receipts; Delhi High Court Direct AO To Tax Rental Income Under ‘Income From House Property’

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court while upholding the ruling of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to tax rental income under ‘income from house property’.

The bench of Justice Yashwant Varma and Justice Ravinder Dudeja has observed that the factory building owned by the assessee was let out to M/s Anand Engines Component Ltd., for which the assessee earned rental income of Rs. 47.26 lakhs. Whether there existed ‘leave and licence’ agreement and not ‘rental agreement’ would not change the colour of receipts in the hands of the assessee. 

Background – Rental Income

The appellant-department, Principal Commissioner has challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 04 July 2019. The ITAT has upheld the decision of the CIT(A) in deleting the disallowance under section 80IC of the Income Tax Act.

The tribunal has held that the Assessing Officer has not appreciated the underlying facts in issue in true perspective. Correct facts are that the manufacturing unit at Parwanoo, Himachal Pradesh was eligible for deduction under section 80IC of the Income Tax Act. The undertaking belongs to M/s Purolotor India Ltd. 

Rental Income
Rental Income

The tribunal was of the opinion that the Assessing Officer proceeded by wrong assumption of facts that M/s Purolator India Ltd got amalgamated with M/s Mahle Filter Systems [India] Ltd whereas the fact of the matter is that Mahle Filter systems [India] Ltd was the transferor company and amalgamated with M/s Purolator India Ltd which was the transferee company by order of the High Court of Delhi in the matter of Scheme of Amalgamation of Company Petition No. 53/2008 connected with Company Application No. 172/2007. Subsequently, the name of M/s Purolator India Ltd was changed to M/s Mahle Filter Systems [India] Ltd.

The department submitted that the tribunal has ignored the fact that transaction was sham and purpose of following the circuitous route of first merging M/s Mahle Filter System (India) Ltd. with M/s Purolator India Ltd. and then changing the name of the company to M/s Mahle Filters Systems (India) Ltd. was to get the benefit of deduction under section 80IC of the Income Tax Act

Read More: Direct Tax Weekly Flashback: 15 To 21 September 2024

Conclusion

The court while dismissing the department’s petition held that the assessee has earned rental income from letting out its property and the same has to be taxed under the head ‘income from house property’ eligible for deduction as per the provisions of section 24 of the Act. 

The court directed the Assessing Officer to tax rental income under the head ‘income from house property’ as per provisions of law. 

FAQs

Can Rental Income be Taxed Under ‘Income From House Property’?

Yes. The Delhi High Court while upholding the ruling of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to tax rental income under ‘income from house property’.

Case Details

Case title: The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax  V/S Mahle Filters Systems (India) Ltd

Citation: ITA 44/2020

Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. Aseem Chawla

Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. Neeraj Jain

Decision Date: 11.09.2024

Read Order

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Personal Hearing Can’t Precede Deadline for GST Notice Reply: Uttarakhand High Court Quashes S. 73 Order

The Uttarakhand High Court has set aside a GST assessment order after finding that...

GST Rectification Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because 3 Month Timeline Expired; Authority Doesn’t Become Functus Officio: Uttarakhand High Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has ruled that a GST rectification application filed within the...

Electricity Charges Arise Only After Supply and Billing; Supreme Court Rejects Rs. 57.74 Lakh Demand for Unreleased Additional Load

The Supreme Court has rejected an electricity distribution company’s attempt to recover ₹57.74 lakh...

Refund of Interest Paid on GST Liability Discharged Through ITC: GSTAT Restrains State Benches From Deciding Appeals

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has restrained...

More like this

Personal Hearing Can’t Precede Deadline for GST Notice Reply: Uttarakhand High Court Quashes S. 73 Order

The Uttarakhand High Court has set aside a GST assessment order after finding that...

GST Rectification Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because 3 Month Timeline Expired; Authority Doesn’t Become Functus Officio: Uttarakhand High Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has ruled that a GST rectification application filed within the...

Electricity Charges Arise Only After Supply and Billing; Supreme Court Rejects Rs. 57.74 Lakh Demand for Unreleased Additional Load

The Supreme Court has rejected an electricity distribution company’s attempt to recover ₹57.74 lakh...