Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTJharkhand High Court Allows Anticipatory Bail To Beneficiary Of GST ITC Arising...

Jharkhand High Court Allows Anticipatory Bail To Beneficiary Of GST ITC Arising From Fake Firm

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Jharkhand High Court has granted anticipatory bail to the beneficiary of Input Tax Credit (ITC) under Goods and Service Tax (GST) arising from a fake firm.

The bench of Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay has observed that the assessment has already been quashed and the matter has been remanded back to the assessment authority apart from the quashment of the criminal case instituted in Bokaro Steel City relating to a similar nature of offence, therefore the privilege of anticipatory bail was extended to the petitioner.

The petitioner/assessee sought for the grant of anticipatory bail, as she is apprehending her arrest. It has been alleged that M/s. P.K. Traders at Telco, Jamshedpur being a non-existent Firm/Entity carried out transactions and claimed an amount of Rs. 7.23 Crores by way of Input Tax Credit without there being actual movement of goods and as such has defrauded the government exchequer of due taxes. The petitioner has been implicated as being one of the beneficiaries of the Input Tax Credit.

Read More: GST Appellate Authority Not Empowered To Condone Delay Beyond 30 Days: Andhra Pradesh High Court

The petitioner submitted that for the same set of allegations another First Information Report was instituted at Bokaro being Bokaro Steel City P.S. Case No. 121/2018 which had already been quashed by this Court in Cr.M.P. No. 3318 of 2019. The order of assessment was challenged in the writ petition in which the Court had quashed the demands raised against the petitioner and remanded the matter back to the assessment authority.

The department contended that the petitioner has given a wrong account number to GST Officials.

The court granted the anticipatory bail to the petitioner and directed  to surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks and on her surrender, she shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur.

Case Title: Renu Singh Versus The State of Jharkhand

Case No.: A.B.A. No. 1210 of 2024

Date: 30.08.2024

Counsel For Petitioner: Nitin Kr. Pasari

Counsel For Respondent: Manoj Kumar

Read Order

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 21 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 21, 2026.GSTSUPREME COURT UPHOLDS HC’S REFUSAL...

Serious Investigative Lapses: Supreme Court Orders De Novo Probe Into 2012 Rape-Murder of 17-Year-Old

The Supreme Court has ordered a de novo investigation into the 2012 rape and...

Conflict Between Trade Marks Act S. 134 and Commercial Courts Act on Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench

The Supreme Court has referred to a Larger Bench an important question concerning the...

Supreme Court Clarifies S. 28A Land Acquisition Limitation

The Supreme Court has clarified the scope of Section 28A of the Land Acquisition...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 21 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 21, 2026.GSTSUPREME COURT UPHOLDS HC’S REFUSAL...

Serious Investigative Lapses: Supreme Court Orders De Novo Probe Into 2012 Rape-Murder of 17-Year-Old

The Supreme Court has ordered a de novo investigation into the 2012 rape and...

Conflict Between Trade Marks Act S. 134 and Commercial Courts Act on Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench

The Supreme Court has referred to a Larger Bench an important question concerning the...