Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeDirect TaxOld Tax Losses Remain Valid Under Income-tax Act, 2025; Carry-Forward Deadline Won’t...

Old Tax Losses Remain Valid Under Income-tax Act, 2025; Carry-Forward Deadline Won’t Restart: CBDT

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Taxpayers with eligible losses carried forward under the Income-tax Act, 1961, can continue to use them after the transition to the Income-tax Act, 2025. However, the new legislation does not provide a fresh period for claiming these losses or automatically restore claims that were already ineligible.

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), through its FAQs on the transition between the two laws, has clarified that the change preserves eligible losses along with their existing conditions. The Income-tax Act, 2025, which came into force on April 1, 2026, broadly retains the framework governing adjustment and carry-forward of losses. 

Buy Now: Direct tax (Income Tax) E-Magazine September 2026

Eligible Losses Survive the Transition

The clarification addresses concerns over whether repeal of the 1961 Act would affect taxpayers’ accumulated losses.

Sections 536(2)(m) and 536(2)(n), forming part of the new Act’s repeal and savings framework, preserve the carry-forward and set-off of qualifying losses from earlier years. Such losses retain their original classification, including business, house property and capital losses.

Their utilisation remains subject to the restrictions applicable to the relevant category. A loss does not acquire wider eligibility merely because it is being adjusted against income computed under the new legislation. 

No Fresh Eight-Year Window

For losses subject to a statutory carry-forward limit, the transition does not reset the clock.

An eligible business loss relating to assessment year 2023–24, for example, remains governed by its original eight-year carry-forward window. The taxpayer can use the unexpired portion of that period, subject to the prescribed conditions, but cannot claim another eight years beginning April 1, 2026.

The FAQs also indicate that the principal time limits remain unchanged: ordinary business losses and capital losses retain an eight-year limit, while speculation losses retain a four-year limit. 

House Property and Capital Losses Continue With Restrictions

Eligible house property losses brought forward from earlier years remain available for adjustment against qualifying house property income.

Capital losses also continue to be governed by the distinction between short-term and long-term losses. A long-term capital loss can be adjusted only against long-term capital gains. A short-term capital loss may be adjusted against either short-term or long-term capital gains, subject to the applicable conditions.

Similarly, brought-forward ordinary business losses remain adjustable against eligible business income. Taxpayers must therefore identify both the category of the loss and the income against which they propose to claim it.

Late Filing Does Not Automatically Become Valid

The transition does not cure a failure to satisfy the original conditions for carrying forward a loss.

The CBDT illustrates this through a loss return for AY 2024–25 filed belatedly without meeting Section 139(3), read with Section 80, of the 1961 Act. Where the loss consequently became ineligible for carry-forward, the new Act does not revive it.

However, the consequences of delayed filing must be examined according to the category of loss and the relevant statutory provision. A blanket statement that every loss becomes unavailable merely because a salaried taxpayer files a belated return would be too broad. The clarification concerns losses for which timely filing is a condition of carry-forward. 

Restriction Against Undisclosed Income Continues

The new legislation also preserves the restriction on adjusting brought-forward losses and unabsorbed depreciation against specified undisclosed income arising from search, requisition or survey proceedings.

The CBDT identifies Section 120 of the 2025 Act as continuing the principle previously contained in Section 79A of the 1961 Act. Taxpayers cannot use accumulated losses or unabsorbed depreciation to neutralise such income where the statutory prohibition applies. 

For taxpayers, the practical requirement is to maintain a year-wise record of eligible losses, the amounts already adjusted and the remaining carry-forward period. The legislative transition preserves valid claims while keeping their existing limits and compliance requirements in place.

Read More: GST Refund Ordered In Appeal Can’t Be Denied Over Delayed Portal Upload: Gujarat High Court Allows Refund

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Refund Ordered In Appeal Can’t Be Denied Over Delayed Portal Upload:  Gujarat High Court Allows Refund 

The Gujarat High Court has directed the refund of ₹5,41,032 collected as GST and...

GST Audit’s 3 Month Limit Runs From Later of Document Submission or Actual Audit Commencement: Gujarat HC

The Gujarat High Court has held that the three-month period for completing a GST...

Scotch Whisky Duty Dispute: Companies Seek 75% Import Duty as India Examines Bulk Whisky Imports

India’s reduced tariff on Scotch whisky under the India–UK trade agreement has triggered a...

Trump Signs Executive Order to Reduce Mortgage Costs, Expand Housing Affordability in US

US President Donald Trump has signed an executive order directing federal agencies to take...

More like this

GST Refund Ordered In Appeal Can’t Be Denied Over Delayed Portal Upload:  Gujarat High Court Allows Refund 

The Gujarat High Court has directed the refund of ₹5,41,032 collected as GST and...

GST Audit’s 3 Month Limit Runs From Later of Document Submission or Actual Audit Commencement: Gujarat HC

The Gujarat High Court has held that the three-month period for completing a GST...

Scotch Whisky Duty Dispute: Companies Seek 75% Import Duty as India Examines Bulk Whisky Imports

India’s reduced tariff on Scotch whisky under the India–UK trade agreement has triggered a...