Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationIndia Notifies Principal Purpose Test To Deny Tax Benefits Under Mauritius Treaty:...

India Notifies Principal Purpose Test To Deny Tax Benefits Under Mauritius Treaty: FinMin

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Ministry of Finance has notified amendments to the India–Mauritius Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA), introducing a Principal Purpose Test that allows treaty benefits to be denied where obtaining such relief was one of the principal purposes of an arrangement or transaction.

The protocol inserts Article 27B, titled “Entitlement to Benefits”, after Article 27A of the treaty.

Under the new provision, a benefit relating to an item of income will be denied if, after considering all relevant facts and circumstances, it is reasonable to conclude that obtaining the benefit was one of the principal purposes of an arrangement or transaction that directly or indirectly resulted in that benefit.

Buy Now: Legal & Taxation Combo – 4 Premium E-Magazines – September 2026

The provision also contains an exception. Treaty relief may still be available if it is established that granting the benefit in those circumstances would accord with the object and purpose of the relevant treaty provisions.

The wording makes the purpose of the arrangement central to eligibility for relief. Obtaining a treaty benefit need not be the sole purpose of a transaction for the test to apply; being one of its principal purposes is sufficient, subject to the stated exception.

Revised Preamble Targets Treaty Shopping

The protocol also replaces the treaty’s preamble to expressly state that eliminating double taxation should not create opportunities for non-taxation or reduced taxation through tax evasion or avoidance.

The revised preamble specifically addresses treaty-shopping arrangements aimed at securing treaty relief for the indirect benefit of residents of third jurisdictions. This places an express anti-abuse objective alongside the treaty’s role in preventing double taxation.

Effective From August 10, 2026

Article 3 provides that the amendments take effect from the protocol’s entry into force, irrespective of the date on which taxes are levied or the taxable years to which those taxes relate.

The notification therefore distinguishes between its publication on October 13, 2026, and the protocol’s effective date of August 10, 2026. The application of this wording to a particular transaction or assessment will require consideration of the relevant facts and treaty provisions.

Implications For Taxpayers

The amendment introduces a broader examination of the purposes behind arrangements through which India–Mauritius treaty benefits are claimed. Commercial objectives and the surrounding facts may consequently become significant in determining whether relief is available under Article 27B.

However, the provision does not automatically deny benefits to every transaction involving Mauritius. It requires a conclusion based on relevant facts and circumstances and preserves relief where granting it is consistent with the object and purpose of the applicable treaty provisions.

The Central Government issued the notification under Section 159(1) of the Income-tax Act, 2025. The annexed protocol amends the convention signed on August 24, 1982, as previously amended by the protocol signed on May 10, 2016.

Membership Required to Access Notification Details & Copy

To view the complete Notification Details and Download Copy, you must have an active membership. Please subscribe to continue.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Read More: Fresh Tax Claim Can’t Be Made In Revision Without A Timely Revised Return: Supreme Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Fresh Tax Claim Can’t Be Made In Revision Without A Timely Revised Return: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that an assessee cannot use revision proceedings under Section...

PAN Misuse | Tax Demand Can’t Rest Solely On Form 26AS Without Independent Inquiry: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has quashed an income tax assessment raising a demand of...

Rs. 8.12 Crore VAT–Income Tax Turnover Mismatch Justifies Reopening Beyond Four Years: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has upheld the reopening of Pernod Ricard India Private Limited’s...

Gold Worth Rs. 35.21 Lakh Hidden in Trolley Bag Linings Seized at Delhi Airport

Delhi Customs officers foiled a gold smuggling attempt at Indira Gandhi International Airport after...

More like this

Fresh Tax Claim Can’t Be Made In Revision Without A Timely Revised Return: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that an assessee cannot use revision proceedings under Section...

PAN Misuse | Tax Demand Can’t Rest Solely On Form 26AS Without Independent Inquiry: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has quashed an income tax assessment raising a demand of...

Rs. 8.12 Crore VAT–Income Tax Turnover Mismatch Justifies Reopening Beyond Four Years: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has upheld the reopening of Pernod Ricard India Private Limited’s...