Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTGST On Minimum-Balance Banking Services: ICICI Bank Gets ₹229.14 Crore SCN

GST On Minimum-Balance Banking Services: ICICI Bank Gets ₹229.14 Crore SCN

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

ICICI Bank has disclosed receipt of a show cause notice seeking ₹229.14 crore in Goods and Services Tax over services offered to customers who maintain specified minimum balances in their accounts. The notice also seeks applicable interest and penalty, in addition to the tax amount.

According to the bank’s stock exchange disclosure, the notice was received on September 30, 2026, from the Additional Commissioner, CGST and Central Excise, Division-IV, Mumbai East Commissionerate. The amount of GST sought is ₹229,14,35,396.

Buy Now: 160+ GST E-Magazine September 2026

Dispute Concerns Services Linked To Minimum Account Balances

The proceedings concern the GST treatment of services provided by the bank to account holders maintaining the prescribed minimum balances. The notice has been issued under Section 73 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, according to the disclosure.

The information disclosed identifies the broad subject of the dispute but does not specify the individual banking services covered, the tax periods involved or the detailed calculation behind the proposed demand. Accordingly, the notice should not be described as a tax on customers’ account balances themselves.

Similar Issues Already Under Litigation

ICICI Bank stated that it is already contesting similar issues arising from earlier orders and show cause notices. Those proceedings include a writ petition, indicating that the treatment of minimum-balance-linked banking services is already the subject of a legal challenge.

The latest notice therefore adds to an existing dispute involving the bank and the tax authorities. The disclosure does not provide the status or outcome of the earlier proceedings.

Disclosure Made After Materiality Threshold Was Crossed

The lender explained that the aggregate or cumulative amount involved crossed the applicable materiality threshold, prompting it to report the development to the stock exchanges.

While the notice seeks approximately ₹229.14 crore in GST, the interest and penalty are additional components. The disclosure does not quantify those amounts, so the complete monetary exposure cannot be determined from the stated tax figure alone.

Bank To Respond Within Prescribed Time

ICICI Bank said it would submit its reply to the show cause notice within the prescribed timelines. Its response will provide the bank’s position on the proposed tax claim.

The matter remains at the show cause notice stage. The reported amount represents the tax sought by the authorities in the notice; the disclosure does not establish that it has been confirmed through a final adjudication order or accepted by the bank as payable.

Read More: Administrative Delays, Change Of Counsel Can’t Justify Belated Tax Appeal: Rajasthan HC

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Administrative Delays, Change Of Counsel Can’t Justify Belated Tax Appeal: Rajasthan HC

The Rajasthan High Court has dismissed a tax department appeal filed after a delay...

Intermediary Or Export Of Services? Dept.’s Appeal Against Rs. 4.31 Crore Service Tax Relief Must Go To Supreme Court: Karnataka HC

The Karnataka High Court has dismissed the Revenue’s appeal against a tribunal order concerning...

Income Tax Search Statement Alone Can’t Justify Additions Without Supporting Evidence: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has reiterated that a statement recorded during an income tax...

Purchases Can’t Be Treated As Bogus When Sales Are Accepted And Books Not Rejected: Calcutta HC

The Calcutta High Court has upheld the deletion of a ₹4.38 crore addition for...

More like this

Administrative Delays, Change Of Counsel Can’t Justify Belated Tax Appeal: Rajasthan HC

The Rajasthan High Court has dismissed a tax department appeal filed after a delay...

Intermediary Or Export Of Services? Dept.’s Appeal Against Rs. 4.31 Crore Service Tax Relief Must Go To Supreme Court: Karnataka HC

The Karnataka High Court has dismissed the Revenue’s appeal against a tribunal order concerning...

Income Tax Search Statement Alone Can’t Justify Additions Without Supporting Evidence: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has reiterated that a statement recorded during an income tax...