Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationAnti-Dumping Duty Amendments Notified: Govt. Revises Tariff Classifications Across Multiple Customs Notifications...

Anti-Dumping Duty Amendments Notified: Govt. Revises Tariff Classifications Across Multiple Customs Notifications Effective May 1, 2026

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) has issued Notification amending multiple earlier notifications to update tariff item codes. The changes have been notified under Section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 read with the Anti-Dumping Rules, 1995, and will come into force from May 1, 2026. 

The notification introduces targeted amendments in five earlier ADD notifications issued between 2021 and 2025. These amendments primarily involve substitution and expansion of tariff item codes, thereby refining the scope of goods covered under existing anti-dumping measures.

The government has amended Notification No. 31/2021-Customs (ADD) by expanding tariff coverage. The earlier classification “2918 30 90” has been replaced with “2918 30 70, 2918 30 90,” while “2918 99 90” has been substituted with “2918 99 40, 2918 99 90.” This indicates a broader inclusion of goods within the ADD regime under these headings. 

Similarly, Notification No. 60/2021-Customs (ADD) has been amended to replace tariff entry “2924 29 90” (including its numeric variant) with “2924 29 91, 2924 29 99,” suggesting further granularity in classification for chemicals or related products falling under this code. 

In Notification No. 12/2022-Customs (ADD), two major changes have been carried out. The tariff entry “2924 29 90” has again been substituted with “2924 29 91, 2924 29 99.” Additionally, the earlier entry “2933 39 90” has been replaced with a wider set of codes—“2933 39 70, 2933 39 80, 2933 39 91, 2933 39 99”—indicating a more detailed classification of heterocyclic compounds or similar chemical products under ADD provisions. 

Further, Notification No. 23/2024-Customs (ADD) has been amended by replacing tariff item “7305 11 29” with “7305 11 41, 7305 11 49,” likely impacting specific categories of pipes or tubes subject to anti-dumping duty. 

Lastly, Notification No. 17/2025-Customs (ADD) has been revised to substitute tariff code “2922 19 90” with “2922 19 30, 2922 19 90,” thereby expanding the scope of goods covered within this classification. 

From a regulatory standpoint, the amendments reflect the government’s continued effort to align tariff classifications with evolving trade patterns and product differentiation, ensuring that anti-dumping measures remain effective and accurately targeted. By introducing more specific tariff lines, the authorities aim to prevent circumvention of duties through misclassification or minor product variations.

For importers and trade stakeholders, the notification assumes importance as it may alter duty applicability, compliance requirements, and product classification strategies. Businesses dealing in chemicals, intermediates, and certain industrial goods must reassess their import documentation and classification practices in light of the revised tariff entries.

Overall, the notification underscores the dynamic nature of India’s trade remedy framework, where periodic refinements in tariff codes play a crucial role in maintaining the integrity and effectiveness of anti-dumping duties.

Notification Details

Notification No. 06/2026-Customs (ADD)

Date: 30/04/2026

Read More: Customs (CVD) Notification Amended: Govt. Substitutes Tariff Entries for Certain Steel Pipes Effective May 1, 2026

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

CENVAT Credit Eligibility Bars Extended Limitation, But Doesn’t Wipe Out Reverse Charge Service Tax Liability: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

Offshore Services Claim Needs Evidence; Service Tax Paid by ONGC Must Be Verified: CESTAT 

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has directed fresh...

Share Valuation Can’t Be Rejected Without Expert Opinion Merely Because Projections Differ From Actual Results: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has deleted a share premium addition under...

ED Arrests Advocate Over Alleged Bribes to Unfreeze Accounts in Rs. 28,000 Crore Cyber Fraud Network Probe

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has arrested an advocate for allegedly helping a nationwide cyber...

More like this

CENVAT Credit Eligibility Bars Extended Limitation, But Doesn’t Wipe Out Reverse Charge Service Tax Liability: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

Offshore Services Claim Needs Evidence; Service Tax Paid by ONGC Must Be Verified: CESTAT 

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has directed fresh...

Share Valuation Can’t Be Rejected Without Expert Opinion Merely Because Projections Differ From Actual Results: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has deleted a share premium addition under...