Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationCustoms (CVD) Notification Amended: Govt. Substitutes Tariff Entries for Certain Steel Pipes...

Customs (CVD) Notification Amended: Govt. Substitutes Tariff Entries for Certain Steel Pipes Effective May 1, 2026

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Government has issued Notification introducing a targeted amendment to the existing countervailing duty (CVD) framework on subsidized imports. 

The notification modifies the earlier Notification No. 04/2024-Customs (CVD) by revising specific tariff classifications applicable to certain goods, with effect from May 1, 2026. 

The amendment has been issued under the powers conferred by Section 9(1) and 9(6) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, read with Rules 20, 22, and 24 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Countervailing Duty on Subsidized Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995. These provisions empower the government to impose and modify countervailing duties to offset subsidies granted by exporting countries that may harm domestic industry.

As per the notification, the tariff item “7305 11 29” has been substituted wherever it appeared in the principal notification with two new tariff entries—“7305 11 41” and “7305 11 49.” This substitution indicates a refinement in classification, likely aimed at better aligning the duty structure with more specific categories of goods.

Tariff heading 7305 generally covers other tubes and pipes (for example, welded), having circular cross-sections, of iron or steel, with an external diameter exceeding 406.4 mm. The newly inserted tariff items suggest a more granular classification within this category, which may have implications for importers dealing in large-diameter steel pipes, particularly those used in infrastructure, oil and gas pipelines, and heavy industrial applications.

Notification Details

Notification No. 01/2026-Customs (CVD)

Date: 30/04/2026

Read More: GST Rate Rationalisation: Govt. Clarifies Classification of Beverages Under 5% and 40% Slabs

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 23 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 23, 2026.GSTMere Opting For Longer Route...

Hindu Widow’s Property Right Can Become Absolute Without Partition: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a widow’s failure to seek partition does not,...

Indian Marriage Doesn’t Automatically Bar Divorce Proceedings Abroad: Supreme Court Quashes Injunction Against UK Case

The Supreme Court has held that an Indian court cannot restrain a spouse from...

Missing Original Document Doesn’t Automatically Defeat Forgery Case: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that the absence of an original document alleged to...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 23 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 23, 2026.GSTMere Opting For Longer Route...

Hindu Widow’s Property Right Can Become Absolute Without Partition: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a widow’s failure to seek partition does not,...

Indian Marriage Doesn’t Automatically Bar Divorce Proceedings Abroad: Supreme Court Quashes Injunction Against UK Case

The Supreme Court has held that an Indian court cannot restrain a spouse from...