Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesClassification of ‘Lip Seal’ as Rubber Product, Not Automobile Part; Extended Limitation...

Classification of ‘Lip Seal’ as Rubber Product, Not Automobile Part; Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked in Interpretation Disputes: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Classification of ‘Lip Seal’ as Rubber Product, Not Automobile Part; Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked in Interpretation Disputes: CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has held that “lip seals” are classifiable as rubber products and not as automobile parts, while also setting aside the invocation of the extended period of limitation in the absence of intent to evade duty.  The bench of Justice Dilip Gupta (President)…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Indirect Taxes

Govt. to Evaluate RoSCTL and RoDTEP Export Schemes Amid Changing Global Trade Conditions

NITI Aayog’s proposed study will examine whether the two tax remission schemes are helping...
GST

Rs. 3.13 Lakh GST Demand Over Duplicate E-Way Bills Quashed For Denial of Personal Hearing: GSTAT

The bench of  Raipur Bench of GST Appellate Tribunal has held that two e-way...
GST

GST Arrest Invalid Without Prior Communication of Commissioner’s Order and Promised 7 Day Notice: Punjab and Haryana High Court

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that a GST arrest cannot be...
GST

GSTR-2A Mismatch Alone Can’t Deny Old GST Credit, but Supplier’s Late Certificate Must Be Backed by Evidence: GSTAT

The Goods and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) has upheld a ₹1.42 lakh demand...

More like this

Indirect Taxes

Govt. to Evaluate RoSCTL and RoDTEP Export Schemes Amid Changing Global Trade Conditions

NITI Aayog’s proposed study will examine whether the two tax remission schemes are helping...
GST

Rs. 3.13 Lakh GST Demand Over Duplicate E-Way Bills Quashed For Denial of Personal Hearing: GSTAT

The bench of  Raipur Bench of GST Appellate Tribunal has held that two e-way...
GST

GST Arrest Invalid Without Prior Communication of Commissioner’s Order and Promised 7 Day Notice: Punjab and Haryana High Court

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that a GST arrest cannot be...