Bogus Purchases Dispute Not a ‘Substantial Question of Law’: Delhi High Court Dismisses Income Tax Dept. Appeal on Low Tax Effect

HomeDirect TaxBogus Purchases Dispute Not a ‘Substantial Question of Law’: Delhi High Court...

Bogus Purchases Dispute Not a ‘Substantial Question of Law’: Delhi High Court Dismisses Income Tax Dept. Appeal on Low Tax Effect

Direct Tax Top Stories

Published on

27/04/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has dismissed an appeal filed by the Income Tax Department holding that in the dispute related to bogus purchases the issues raised primarily involved questions of fact and did not warrant interference under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act. The Bench of Justices Dinesh Mehta and Vinod Kumar noted that…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Substantial Question of Law

Bogus Purchases Dispute Not a ‘Substantial Question of Law’: Delhi High Court Dismisses Income Tax Dept. Appeal on Low Tax Effect

Membership Required

Latest articles

ITAT Pune Deletes Rs. 99 Cr TP Adjustments in Bosch Case, Upholds TNMM

Arbitration | Unsuccessful Party Can Seek Interim Relief Under S. 9 Post-Award: Supreme Court

Courts Can’t Examine Merits While Deciding Plea for Amendment of Plaint; Legal Heirs Can Raise Bona Fide Need Based on Subsequent Events

Avail Statutory Appeal Remedy: Jharkhand High Court Refuses to Entertain Tata Steel’s Writ Against GST Order

More like this

ITAT Pune Deletes Rs. 99 Cr TP Adjustments in Bosch Case, Upholds TNMM

Arbitration | Unsuccessful Party Can Seek Interim Relief Under S. 9 Post-Award: Supreme Court

Courts Can’t Examine Merits While Deciding Plea for Amendment of Plaint; Legal Heirs Can Raise Bona Fide Need Based on Subsequent Events

About us

Company

Categories