Car Seat Mechanisms Classifiable as ‘Parts of Seats’: CESTAT Slams Commissioner for Breach of Judicial Discipline

HomeIndirect TaxesCar Seat Mechanisms Classifiable as ‘Parts of Seats’: CESTAT Slams Commissioner for...

Car Seat Mechanisms Classifiable as ‘Parts of Seats’: CESTAT Slams Commissioner for Breach of Judicial Discipline

Indirect Taxes Top Stories

Published on

22/04/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

Car Seat Mechanisms Classifiable as ‘Parts of Seats’: CESTAT Slams Commissioner for Breach of Judicial Discipline

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi Principal Bench, has set aside a customs duty demand and penalty holding that imported seat mechanisms such as track assemblies and adjusters are classifiable as “parts of seats” and not as “parts and accessories of motor vehicles.” The bench of Justice Dilip Gupta (President) and…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Car Seat Mechanisms Classifiable as ‘Parts of Seats’: CESTAT Slams Commissioner for Breach of Judicial Discipline

Membership Required

Latest articles

ITC Refund Limitation Must Be Counted Based on Nature of Supply, Not Mechanical Application of S. 54: Delhi High Court

CUSTOMS ACT | Nominal Shortfall in Penalty Can’t Deny Amnesty Benefit Under Customs Law: CESTAT

Insurance, Hedging & Employee Training Services Qualify as Input Services: CESTAT Allows Cenvat Credit

Statements Without S. 9D Procedure Not Admissible: CESTAT Quashes Rs. 4.12 Cr CENVAT Credit Demand

More like this

ITC Refund Limitation Must Be Counted Based on Nature of Supply, Not Mechanical Application of S. 54: Delhi High Court

CUSTOMS ACT | Nominal Shortfall in Penalty Can’t Deny Amnesty Benefit Under Customs Law: CESTAT

Insurance, Hedging & Employee Training Services Qualify as Input Services: CESTAT Allows Cenvat Credit

About us

Company

Categories