Login
Login
HomeDirect TaxRequirement Of Audit Report For Purpose Of S. 80IA (7) Is Directory...

Requirement Of Audit Report For Purpose Of S. 80IA (7) Is Directory And Not Mandatory, Can Be Filed At Appellate Stage: Madras HC

Direct TaxTop Stories

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Madras HC

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Madras High court has held that the requirement of an audit report for the purpose of Section 80IA(7) of the Income Tax Act, 1962 is directory and not mandatory. The bench of Dr Justice G. Jayachandran and Justice Shamim Ahmed has observed that the right to file an audit report at the appellate stage…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST

ITC Refund Limitation Must Be Counted Based on Nature of Supply, Not Mechanical Application of S. 54: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has clarified the correct interpretation of limitation under Section 54...
Indirect Taxes

CUSTOMS ACT | Nominal Shortfall in Penalty Can’t Deny Amnesty Benefit Under Customs Law: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench, has held that a...
Indirect Taxes

Insurance, Hedging & Employee Training Services Qualify as Input Services: CESTAT Allows Cenvat Credit

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...
Indirect Taxes

Statements Without S. 9D Procedure Not Admissible: CESTAT Quashes Rs. 4.12 Cr CENVAT Credit Demand

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi Principal Bench, has...

More like this

GST

ITC Refund Limitation Must Be Counted Based on Nature of Supply, Not Mechanical Application of S. 54: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has clarified the correct interpretation of limitation under Section 54...
Indirect Taxes

CUSTOMS ACT | Nominal Shortfall in Penalty Can’t Deny Amnesty Benefit Under Customs Law: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench, has held that a...
Indirect Taxes

Insurance, Hedging & Employee Training Services Qualify as Input Services: CESTAT Allows Cenvat Credit

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

About us

About Jurishour – Juris Hour is an online news portal for reporting accurate and honest news, articles, judgments, Circulars, orders and notifications related to legal developments.

Company

Categories

© 2025 Juris Hour. All Rights Reserved.