CESTAT: Assessing Officer Failed to Consider Contract Amendments; Orders Fresh Valuation in Iron Ore Export Case

HomeIndirect TaxesCESTAT: Assessing Officer Failed to Consider Contract Amendments; Orders Fresh Valuation in...

CESTAT: Assessing Officer Failed to Consider Contract Amendments; Orders Fresh Valuation in Iron Ore Export Case

Indirect Taxes

Published on

06/04/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad Bench, has set aside an earlier appellate order in a dispute involving iron ore exports and directed a fresh assessment of shipping bills, emphasizing the importance of contractual amendments and actual transaction value. The Bench of Angad Prasad (Judicial Member) and A.K. Jyotishi (Technical Member)…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

CESTAT: Assessing Officer Failed to Consider Contract Amendments; Orders Fresh Valuation in Iron Ore Export Case

Membership Required

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 29 JULY, 2026

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of ‘Imprisonment for Remainder of Natural Life’

Reach Stackers Used Only Inside Inland Container Depots Are Not ‘Motor Vehicles’ Under Motor Vehicles Act: Supreme Court

National Commission for Scheduled Castes Can’t Pass Binding Orders in Service Matters, Role Is Recommendatory: Supreme Court

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 29 JULY, 2026

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of ‘Imprisonment for Remainder of Natural Life’

Reach Stackers Used Only Inside Inland Container Depots Are Not ‘Motor Vehicles’ Under Motor Vehicles Act: Supreme Court

About us

Company

Categories