HomeGSTGST | Special Audit Can’t Be Reopened Once Completed: Bombay High Court 

GST | Special Audit Can’t Be Reopened Once Completed: Bombay High Court 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bombay High Court has refused to order a supplementary audit and held that once a special audit under Section 66 of the CGST Act is completed, it cannot be reopened at the behest of the taxpayer. The bench of Justice G. S. Kulkarni and Justice Aarti Sathe has observed that as per Section 66…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Nikhil Bhandari
Nikhil Bhandari
Nikhil Bhandari is a Chartered Accountant and a Indirect Tax professional with over 4.5 years of post-qualification experience in tax advisory, compliance management, and tax process optimization. Associated with SDU LLP since August 2015 spanning his articleship through to his current role as Assistant Manager Nikhil has uniquely navigated India’s transition from the legacy tax regime into the GST era.His expertise encompasses both strategic advisory and Indirect Tax litigation, where he represents clients in complex disputes across the manufacturing, service, and e-commerce sectors. By providing high-level counsel to corporate leadership, he ensures that tax positions are not only robust and compliant but also structured for long-term operational efficiency.Beyond his core practice, Nikhil is a proactive contributor to the GST ecosystem. He is dedicated to tracking and analyzing judicial precedents from various High Courts and the Supreme Court, fostering greater clarity and ease of access to tax intelligence for the wider professional community.

Latest articles

Limitation Issue in Search-Related Cases: Calcutta High Court Stays Reassessment Notices

The Calcutta High Court has stayed reassessment proceedings initiated by the Income Tax Department,...

Mere Issuance Of Order Doesn’t Amount To Valid Communication Unless Supported By Evidence of Service: CESTAT 

The Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

SGST | Composite Notice for 6 FY Against Hindustan Zinc Stayed: Rajasthan High Court 

The Rajasthan High Court has stayed the composite notice for 6 Financial Years (FY)...

ITC Demands Based on GSTR-2A & GSTR-3B Mismatch Under Scrutiny: Case Laws That Limits on Departmental Action

In recent times, taxpayers across India have increasingly faced substantial tax demands arising solely...

More like this

Limitation Issue in Search-Related Cases: Calcutta High Court Stays Reassessment Notices

The Calcutta High Court has stayed reassessment proceedings initiated by the Income Tax Department,...

Mere Issuance Of Order Doesn’t Amount To Valid Communication Unless Supported By Evidence of Service: CESTAT 

The Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

SGST | Composite Notice for 6 FY Against Hindustan Zinc Stayed: Rajasthan High Court 

The Rajasthan High Court has stayed the composite notice for 6 Financial Years (FY)...