EXCISE DUTY | QR-Coded Liquor Tracking Upheld: Meghalaya High Court Refuses To Intervene In IEMS for End-to-End Supply Chain Monitoring

HomeIndirect TaxesEXCISE DUTY | QR-Coded Liquor Tracking Upheld: Meghalaya High Court Refuses To...

EXCISE DUTY | QR-Coded Liquor Tracking Upheld: Meghalaya High Court Refuses To Intervene In IEMS for End-to-End Supply Chain Monitoring

Indirect Taxes

Published on

27/03/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Meghalaya High Court while upholding the QR-coded liquor tracking backed Integrated Excise Management System (IEMS) for end-to-end supply chain monitoring. The bench of Justice H.S.Thangkhiew and Justice B. Bhattacharjee has however has struck down a key amendment reducing the profit margin of liquor retailers from 20% to 15%, holding it to be arbitrary and…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
QR-Coded Liquor Tracking

EXCISE DUTY | QR-Coded Liquor Tracking Upheld: Meghalaya High Court Refuses To Intervene In IEMS for End-to-End Supply Chain Monitoring

Membership Required

Latest articles

Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC Can’t Be Used to Fill Gaps in Evidence: Supreme Court Limits Recall of Witnesses

Umadevi Can’t Be Used to Justify Perpetual Temporary Employment: Supreme Court Orders Regularisation of Long-Serving Goa PWD Workers

Frame Guidelines for Environmental Compensation Under Solid Waste Management Rules, 2026: Supreme Court Directs Centre

Resignation Accepted by Incompetent Officer Can Be Validated by Ratification: Supreme Court

More like this

Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC Can’t Be Used to Fill Gaps in Evidence: Supreme Court Limits Recall of Witnesses

Umadevi Can’t Be Used to Justify Perpetual Temporary Employment: Supreme Court Orders Regularisation of Long-Serving Goa PWD Workers

Frame Guidelines for Environmental Compensation Under Solid Waste Management Rules, 2026: Supreme Court Directs Centre

About us

Company

Categories