Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsWomen’s Representation & Nomination Fee in Focus: Patna High Court Seeks Justification...

Women’s Representation & Nomination Fee in Focus: Patna High Court Seeks Justification in Advocates’ Body Elections Case

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Patna High Court took up a writ petition filed by  Advocate Saroj Kumar concerning issues surrounding the upcoming Advocates’ Association elections, particularly the participation of women and the fixation of nomination fee.

The matter was heard by Justice Ajit Kumar in a civil writ jurisdiction case filed by advocate Saroj Kumar. The petition raised concerns over certain aspects of the election process, including adherence to guidelines and the rationale behind nomination charges for candidates contesting various posts.

During the hearing, the Court sought clarification from the Chairman of the Bihar State Bar Council and the Returning Officer of the Advocates’ Association elections. Senior counsel appearing for the respondents informed the Court that any decision regarding women’s participation would be taken strictly in line with the directions issued by the Supreme Court of India.

On the issue of nomination fees, the respondents submitted that they would place on record the reasoning and justification for the fee structure. They assured the Court that the fixation would be supported by a “reasonable nexus” along with relevant materials explaining the basis of such charges.

The Court also observed that if required, consultations may be held with the current office bearers of the Advocates’ Association to arrive at an amicable resolution on the fee issue. It emphasized that such deliberations should be properly documented and presented before the Court for consideration.

Taking note of the time-sensitive nature of the election process, the Court listed the matter for further hearing on March 26, 2026, at 10:30 AM.

Case Details

Case Title:  Saroj Kumar, Advocate (in person) Versus  The Bar Council of India 

Case No.:  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4393 of 2026

Date: 25/03/2026

Counsel For  Petitioner: Saroj Kumar (In Person)

Counsel For Respondent: Ramakant Sharma, Sr. Advocate

Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Latest articles

GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred Where Delay Occurred Beyond Taxpayer’s Control: Rajasthan High Court

The Rajasthan High Court has directed the GST Appellate Authority to entertain an appeal...

Custodial Interrogation Necessary to Trace Gutka Machinery Removed After DGGI Seizure: Punjab and Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has refused anticipatory bail to a person accused...

GST Dept. Cant Adjust Sanctioned Refund Against Interest Liability Without Demand Notice and Hearing: Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court has ruled that tax authorities cannot appropriate a sanctioned refund...

Dept. Can’t Apply Different Yardsticks in Identical Tax Cases: Bombay HC Quashes Rs. 21.92 Crore Service Tax Demand

The Bombay High Court has dismissed a departmental appeal challenging the setting aside of...

More like this

GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred Where Delay Occurred Beyond Taxpayer’s Control: Rajasthan High Court

The Rajasthan High Court has directed the GST Appellate Authority to entertain an appeal...

Custodial Interrogation Necessary to Trace Gutka Machinery Removed After DGGI Seizure: Punjab and Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has refused anticipatory bail to a person accused...

GST Dept. Cant Adjust Sanctioned Refund Against Interest Liability Without Demand Notice and Hearing: Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court has ruled that tax authorities cannot appropriate a sanctioned refund...