Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesCompanies Located Outside India To Be Treated As Distinct Person And Transaction...

Companies Located Outside India To Be Treated As Distinct Person And Transaction Between Them Amounts To Export Of Service: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that companies located outside India/non-taxable territories are to be treated as distinct persons and the transaction between them shall be qualified to be called as Export of Service. The bench of Dr. Rachna Gupta (Judicial Member) has observed that the appellant/service…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST

GST Refund After Successful Appeal | 6% Interest Runs From 60 Days After Original Application: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Andhra Pradesh State Bench at Vijayawada,...
GST

GSTR-2A Mismatch Alone Can’t Prove Wrong ITC Claim: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Hyderabad, has substantially reduced an input...
GST

GST Dept. Can’t Use S. 73 To Recover Pre-GST CENVAT Credit On Eligibility Grounds: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has held that proceedings...
GST

GST Audit Detection Alone Doesn’t Prove Wilful Suppression: GSTAT Quashes S. 74 Proceedings

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has held that a...

More like this

GST

GST Refund After Successful Appeal | 6% Interest Runs From 60 Days After Original Application: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Andhra Pradesh State Bench at Vijayawada,...
GST

GSTR-2A Mismatch Alone Can’t Prove Wrong ITC Claim: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Hyderabad, has substantially reduced an input...
GST

GST Dept. Can’t Use S. 73 To Recover Pre-GST CENVAT Credit On Eligibility Grounds: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has held that proceedings...