Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesCompanies Located Outside India To Be Treated As Distinct Person And Transaction...

Companies Located Outside India To Be Treated As Distinct Person And Transaction Between Them Amounts To Export Of Service: CESTAT

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that companies located outside India/non-taxable territories are to be treated as distinct persons and the transaction between them shall be qualified to be called as Export of Service. The bench of Dr. Rachna Gupta (Judicial Member) has observed that the appellant/service…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

CESTAT Quashes Rs. 22.49 Lakh Excise Duty Demand on Motor Vehicle Cabin Manufacturer Over Customer-Supplied Drawings

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Insurance Premium Collected and Remitted to Insurer Not Taxable as Part of Microfinance Company’s Service Value: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Misclassification Claims Rejected on Automobile Components: CESTAT Upholds Customs Duty Demand

The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New...

Bombay High Court Quashes Rs. 100 Crore PMLA Freezing Action Against Coda Payments

The Bombay High Court has set aside the Enforcement Directorate’s freezing and retention proceedings...

More like this

CESTAT Quashes Rs. 22.49 Lakh Excise Duty Demand on Motor Vehicle Cabin Manufacturer Over Customer-Supplied Drawings

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Insurance Premium Collected and Remitted to Insurer Not Taxable as Part of Microfinance Company’s Service Value: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Misclassification Claims Rejected on Automobile Components: CESTAT Upholds Customs Duty Demand

The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New...