HomeIndirect TaxesCBI Court Sentences Central Excise and Service Tax Inspector to 5 Years...

CBI Court Sentences Central Excise and Service Tax Inspector to 5 Years RI in Disproportionate Assets Case

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The CBI Court, Ahmedabad has convicted and sentenced the accused Kaushik Anvantrai Karelia, the then Appraiser/Preventive Officer, Kandla Special Economic Zone (KASEZ), presently working as Inspector, Central Excise and Service tax, Bhavnagar, to Five Years Rigorous Imprisonment (RI) with fine of Rs. 63,00,000 in a Disproportionate Assets case. 

His wife Pooja Karelia has been sentenced to One Year Imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 50,000 for abetment of the offence in the said Disproportionate Assets (DA) case.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) registered the instant case on 30.09.2013 against the accused Kaushik Anvantrai Karelia, the then Appraiser/Preventive Officer, Kandla Special Economic Zone (KASEZ), presently working as Inspector, Central Excise and Service tax, Bhavnagar on the allegations that the accused during the period 01.09.2008 to 31.03.2013, had amassed assets disproportionate to their known source of income to the tune of Rs.19,86,661 which was 130% in excess to their known source of income.  

During investigation, the check period was revised from 01.04.2004 to 20.03.2013. After the investigation, CBI filed chargesheet on 03.09.2014 against the accused Kaushik Anvantrai Karelia and Pooja Karelia, W/o Kaushik Karelia for amassing assets to the tune of Rs.57,60,729.15 disproportionate to their known source of income, which is 183.57% in excess to their known source of income.

The Court, after the trial, convicted and sentenced the accused persons accordingly.

Click Here To Read Press Release

Read More: Why Silver Prices Are Skyrocketing — And How China’s Export Policy Is Reshaping the Global Market?

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

SAD Refund Limitation to Be Counted from Date of Domestic Sale And Not From The Date of Import: Calcutta HC

The Calcutta High Court has reiterated that the Special Additional Duty (SAD) refund limitation...

Titan Challenges Deemed Supply Provision Under GST: Madras High Court to Examine Taxability of Unreturned Job Work Inputs

In a significant development for the manufacturing and GST ecosystem, Titan Company Limited has...

Can Service Tax Be Demanded Solely on Form 26AS Data Without Pre-SCN Consultation? Gauhati High Court Remand Back Matter to CESTAT

The Gauhati High Court while remanding the matter to the Customs, Excise and Service...

Amended Formula U/R 89 (5) For Inverted Duty Refunds Is Retrospectively Applicable: Andhra Pradesh HC

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has held that the amended formula under Rule 89...

More like this

SAD Refund Limitation to Be Counted from Date of Domestic Sale And Not From The Date of Import: Calcutta HC

The Calcutta High Court has reiterated that the Special Additional Duty (SAD) refund limitation...

Titan Challenges Deemed Supply Provision Under GST: Madras High Court to Examine Taxability of Unreturned Job Work Inputs

In a significant development for the manufacturing and GST ecosystem, Titan Company Limited has...

Can Service Tax Be Demanded Solely on Form 26AS Data Without Pre-SCN Consultation? Gauhati High Court Remand Back Matter to CESTAT

The Gauhati High Court while remanding the matter to the Customs, Excise and Service...