Mere Location of DRI or CRCL in Delhi Does Not Confer Territorial Jurisdiction In Goods Seizure Cases: Delhi HC

HomeIndirect TaxesMere Location of DRI or CRCL in Delhi Does Not Confer Territorial...

Mere Location of DRI or CRCL in Delhi Does Not Confer Territorial Jurisdiction In Goods Seizure Cases: Delhi HC

Indirect Taxes

Published on

20/12/2025

By Mariya Paliwala

Mere Location of DRI or CRCL in Delhi Does Not Confer Territorial Jurisdiction In Goods Seizure Cases: Delhi HC

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has held that mere location of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) or Central Revenue Control Laboratory (CRCL) in Delhi does not confer territorial jurisdiction in goods seizure cases. The bench of Justice Prathiba M. Singh and Justice Renu Bhatnagar has dismissed a set of writ petitions challenging seizure of imported goods…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Territorial Jurisdiction

Mere Location of DRI or CRCL in Delhi Does Not Confer Territorial Jurisdiction In Goods Seizure Cases: Delhi HC

Membership Required

Latest articles

BREAKING : Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026

Private Records Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Clearance Without Corroborative Evidence: CESTAT

ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court

Resale Price Method Must Prevail Where Imported Goods Are Resold Without Value Addition; ITAT Deletes Transfer Pricing Adjustment

More like this

BREAKING : Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026

Private Records Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Clearance Without Corroborative Evidence: CESTAT

ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court

About us

Company

Categories