HomeNotificationBREAKING : Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to...

BREAKING : Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Government has extended the last date for filing appeals and applications before the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) to July 31, 2026, replacing the earlier deadline of June 30, 2026

The move comes through a notification issued by the Ministry of Finance under Section 112 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017, following the recommendations of the GST Council. 

The notification supersedes the earlier Notification No. S.O. 4220(E) dated September 17, 2025, while safeguarding actions already taken under the previous notification. 

Buy Now: Litigation Guide For GSTAT : From Litigation Checklist To Procedure Guide Specially Designed To Carter Requirements Of CAs, Advocate

Relief for Taxpayers Awaiting GSTAT Appeals

The extension provides additional time to taxpayers whose appellate remedies were dependent on the operationalisation of the GST Appellate Tribunal. Since GSTAT benches have only recently become functional, the Government has been issuing special notifications prescribing a common deadline for filing appeals relating to older orders.

With the latest notification, all eligible taxpayers now have until July 31, 2026, to file appeals against specified orders before the Tribunal.

Appeals Against Orders Communicated Before May 1, 2026

The notification provides that where an adjudication order was communicated to the person preferring the appeal before May 1, 2026, the appeal may be filed before the GST Appellate Tribunal up to July 31, 2026

For orders communicated on or after May 1, 2026, the normal limitation period under Section 112(1) of the CGST Act will apply. Accordingly, appeals must be filed within three months from the date on which the order is communicated

Timeline for Departmental Applications

The notification also prescribes timelines for applications filed under Section 112(3) of the CGST Act.

It states that where the order sought to be challenged was passed before February 1, 2026, the concerned application may be filed up to July 31, 2026

However, for orders passed on or after February 1, 2026, the statutory limitation period will continue to apply, requiring applications to be filed within six months from the date of the order

Government of India.

Membership Required to Access Notification Details & Copy

To view the complete Notification Details and Download Copy, you must have an active membership. Please subscribe to continue.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Read More: Private Records Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Clearance Without Corroborative Evidence: ITAT

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Composite Cargo Handling Contracts Can’t Be Split into GTA Services: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Ahmedabad Bench, has held that...

Excise Duty Exemption on Hot Rolled Stainless Steel Pattas Prior to Cold Rolling: CESTAT  

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Private Records Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Clearance Without Corroborative Evidence: CESTAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has quashed an order blocking a taxpayer's Input Tax Credit...

More like this

Composite Cargo Handling Contracts Can’t Be Split into GTA Services: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Ahmedabad Bench, has held that...

Excise Duty Exemption on Hot Rolled Stainless Steel Pattas Prior to Cold Rolling: CESTAT  

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Private Records Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Clearance Without Corroborative Evidence: CESTAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...