Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsJharkhand HC Dismisses Husband’s Appeal Seeking Divorce Citing His Failure To Prove...

Jharkhand HC Dismisses Husband’s Appeal Seeking Divorce Citing His Failure To Prove Cruelty/Desertion Against His Wife

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Jharkhand High Court has dismissed a husband’s appeal seeking dissolution of marriage under Section 13(1)(i-a) and 13(1)(i-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, holding that he failed to prove cruelty or desertion by his wife and divorce can’t be granted without proof of cruelty or desertion under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act. The Bench…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Dealer Incentives Can’t Be Taxed Merely on Ledger Entries: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has set aside a...

Customs Interest Can’t Be Backdated Before Confiscation Liability Is Determined; Nearly 8 Year Period Excluded: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has held that interest arising from customs confiscation and redemption...

GST Cross-Empowerment Doesn’t Require Separate Notification; Parallel Proceedings on Same Issue Remain Barred: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has held that the absence of a separate notification under...

GST Penalty U/s 122(1A) Can’t Apply to Pre-2021 Transactions; Unregistered Beneficiaries Also Covered: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that personal penalties under Section 122(1A) of the...

More like this

Dealer Incentives Can’t Be Taxed Merely on Ledger Entries: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has set aside a...

Customs Interest Can’t Be Backdated Before Confiscation Liability Is Determined; Nearly 8 Year Period Excluded: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has held that interest arising from customs confiscation and redemption...

GST Cross-Empowerment Doesn’t Require Separate Notification; Parallel Proceedings on Same Issue Remain Barred: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has held that the absence of a separate notification under...