Mall’s Engagement of Parking Operator Is Not Leasing; Service Tax Exemption Under Notification 25/2012 Still Applies: CESTAT

HomeIndirect TaxesMall’s Engagement of Parking Operator Is Not Leasing; Service Tax Exemption Under...

Mall’s Engagement of Parking Operator Is Not Leasing; Service Tax Exemption Under Notification 25/2012 Still Applies: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes

Published on

14/11/2025

By Mariya Paliwala

Mall’s Engagement of Parking Operator Is Not Leasing; Service Tax Exemption Under Notification 25/2012 Still Applies: CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai Bench has held that a Shopping Mall engaging a specialised entity to operate and maintain the parking area, would not amount to leasing of parking space by the mall to such entity, so as to become disentitled to claim exemption from payment of Service Tax…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Mall’s Engagement of Parking Operator Is Not Leasing; Service Tax Exemption Under Notification 25/2012 Still Applies: CESTAT

Membership Required

Latest articles

Mere Facilitation of Customs Clearance Can’t Establish Knowledge of Smuggling: Madras High Court

Income Tax Dept. Can’t Ignore Documents, Furnished by Assessee While Making Unexplained-Credit Addition: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court Declines to Revisit CENVAT Credit Evidence, Holds Judicial Review of Settlement Commission Orders Narrow

Settled Customs Dispute Can’t Be Reopened Through Article 226 Challenge to Interest Liability: Delhi High Court

More like this

Mere Facilitation of Customs Clearance Can’t Establish Knowledge of Smuggling: Madras High Court

Income Tax Dept. Can’t Ignore Documents, Furnished by Assessee While Making Unexplained-Credit Addition: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court Declines to Revisit CENVAT Credit Evidence, Holds Judicial Review of Settlement Commission Orders Narrow

About us

Company

Categories