Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTITC Blocking Can't Exceed One Year: Bombay High Court Quashes GST Bank...

ITC Blocking Can’t Exceed One Year: Bombay High Court Quashes GST Bank Account Attachment

GST

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
ITC Blocking Can't Exceed One Year: Bombay High Court Quashes GST Bank Account Attachment

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bombay High Court ruled that GST Inpit Tax Credit (ITC) cannot be blocked beyond one year under Rule 86A. The bench of Justice G. S. Kulkarni and Justice Aarti Sathe has ruled that Input Tax Credit (ITC) cannot remain blocked beyond the statutory period of one year under GST law. The Court quashed the…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Indirect Taxes

Profit From Purchase and Sale of Cargo Space Not Taxable as Business Auxiliary Service: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...
Indirect Taxes

Service Tax Demand Can’t Be Based Solely on Difference Between Balance Sheet and ST-3 Returns: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Bangalore, has ruled that a...
Indirect Taxes

Importer’s Consent to Enhanced Customs Valuation Does Not Bar Statutory Appeal: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has ruled that an...
Indirect Taxes

Foreign Supplier’s ‘Packing Mistake’ Can’t Explain Undeclared Branded Goods in Import Consignment: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has held that an...

More like this

Indirect Taxes

Profit From Purchase and Sale of Cargo Space Not Taxable as Business Auxiliary Service: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...
Indirect Taxes

Service Tax Demand Can’t Be Based Solely on Difference Between Balance Sheet and ST-3 Returns: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Bangalore, has ruled that a...
Indirect Taxes

Importer’s Consent to Enhanced Customs Valuation Does Not Bar Statutory Appeal: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has ruled that an...