HomeOther Laws‘We Invite You All for Tea as Nobody Appeared in Court’: Delhi...

‘We Invite You All for Tea as Nobody Appeared in Court’: Delhi High Court Chief Justice Expresses Displeasure Over Repeated Adjournments

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a sharp observation reflecting frustration over frequent adjournment requests, Delhi High Court Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya on Monday remarked, “We invite you all for tea as nobody appeared in court.” The comment came after several matters listed before the Bench witnessed no representation or repeated pleas for adjournment.

Chief Justice Upadhyaya noted that while courts are often criticised for delays in hearings, the reality is that many cases do not proceed because lawyers or parties seek adjournments when the matters are called.

“The courts are blamed for not hearing the matters, but when the matters are taken up, adjournment is sought,” the Chief Justice remarked in open court.

The Bench, which was scheduled to hear a large number of cases, found that in several instances either the counsels were absent or sought to defer the hearing to another date.

Legal observers said the remark underscores a persistent problem in the judicial system — the tendency of parties to delay proceedings, contributing to the mounting backlog of cases.

The Chief Justice’s comments serve as a reminder that timely participation from all stakeholders — judges, lawyers, and litigants — is essential for the effective functioning of the justice delivery system.

The court later proceeded to take up matters where counsels were present and reiterated that unnecessary adjournments would not be entertained unless justified by valid reasons.

Read More: SCOARA Condemns Delhi Attack, Calls for Unity and Upholding Rule of Law

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 4, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for March 4, 2026.GSTEXECUTIVE CIRCULAR CAN’T CURTAIL STATUTORY...

When Service Tax Is Shown Separately In Invoices, Assessee Can’t Later Claim Cum-Tax Benefit Merely Because Tenant Failed To Pay Tax: CESTAT

The Bengaluru Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), has upheld...

ITAT Remands Rs. 1.47 Crore Addition Over Unexplained Cash Deposits Under S. 69A

The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside an addition...

Dept. Failed to Prove Clandestine Removal In ‘Gold Mohar’ Pan Masala Case: CESTAT Quashes Cash and Goods Confiscation 

The Allahabad Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has set...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 4, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for March 4, 2026.GSTEXECUTIVE CIRCULAR CAN’T CURTAIL STATUTORY...

When Service Tax Is Shown Separately In Invoices, Assessee Can’t Later Claim Cum-Tax Benefit Merely Because Tenant Failed To Pay Tax: CESTAT

The Bengaluru Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), has upheld...

ITAT Remands Rs. 1.47 Crore Addition Over Unexplained Cash Deposits Under S. 69A

The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside an addition...