HomeGSTGST Registration Cannot Be Permanently Cancelled for Procedural Lapse; Madras HC Orders...

GST Registration Cannot Be Permanently Cancelled for Procedural Lapse; Madras HC Orders Revival

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Madras High Court has held that GST registration cannot be permanently cancelled for procedural lapse. The bench of Justice C. Saravanan held that the matter was fully covered by the earlier Suguna Cut Piece Center decision, which had laid down comprehensive guidelines for the revival of GST registrations cancelled due to non-filing of returns…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Construction of Flats Before July 2012 Not Taxable as Construction Service: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has partly allowed...

18% GST Payable on Entire Hotel Booking Consideration: AAR

The Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) has held that a hospitality company proposing to...

Separate Erection Contract Is Not Works Contract, CESTAT Denies Abatement but Excludes Free-Supply Material from Taxable Value

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has...

Consultancy Services to US Client Not Intermediary Services: CESTAT 

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi Principal Bench, has...

More like this

Construction of Flats Before July 2012 Not Taxable as Construction Service: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has partly allowed...

18% GST Payable on Entire Hotel Booking Consideration: AAR

The Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) has held that a hospitality company proposing to...

Separate Erection Contract Is Not Works Contract, CESTAT Denies Abatement but Excludes Free-Supply Material from Taxable Value

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has...