India’s rapidly expanding e-commerce landscape, driven by rising incomes, deeper digital penetration, and growing consumer demand, has brought cashback incentives to the forefront of online retail strategies.
However, with the cashback economy estimated to cross Rs. 1.23 lakh crore by 2029, tax experts are urging the government to introduce clearer taxation norms to prevent revenue leakage and ensure uniformity in compliance.
A recent policy analysis highlights that while cashback schemes have become one of the most influential tools to attract and retain customers across sectors such as groceries, electronics, fashion, beauty, and digital payments, the tax treatment of these incentives remains inconsistent, leading to ambiguity for both businesses and consumers.
Cashback: A Key Driver of Customer Loyalty
Over the past decade, e-commerce platforms and fintech companies have increasingly relied on AI-driven consumer analytics, faster delivery systems, and customized loyalty programmes to build long-term engagement. Cashback rewards—credited either directly to bank accounts or digital wallets—have emerged as a crucial element of these loyalty strategies.
According to market research data, cashback payouts in India were valued at about $6.58 billion (₹57,000 crore) in 2023, and are projected to grow at 13.4% annually to reach $14.28 billion (₹1,23,700 crore) by 2029. Industry experts say this growth is closely linked to the expanding e-commerce market, which is expected to touch USD 345 billion (₹29.8 lakh crore) by FY 2030.
Where the Tax Ambiguity Lies
Under existing tax laws, the treatment of cashback depends on whether the recipient is an individual consumer or a business entity:
| Scenario | Applicable Tax Treatment |
| Cashback received by individuals not engaged in business or profession | Taxable as Income from Other Sources only if the total value exceeds ₹50,000 in a financial year (Section 56(2)(x)) |
| Cashback or perks received in the course of business or profession | Fully taxable under Profits and Gains from Business or Profession, without any minimum threshold (Section 28(iv)) |
This distinction means that a regular shopper receiving cashback generally enjoys a tax exemption up to ₹50,000, while a business entity receiving the same benefits is taxed from rupee one.
Additionally, while similar income categories often have Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) obligations, there is currently no TDS requirement for cashback payouts, regardless of the amount. This creates an asymmetry in the tax system.
Uniform Rules
Introducing structured reporting and TDS requirements on large cashback payouts would help:
- Prevent revenue leakage
- Create a level playing field between businesses and individuals
- Reduce tax disputes
- Improve transparency in digital payment incentives
They note that in many cases, businesses and fintech companies deduct cashback amounts as promotional expenditure, which reduces taxable profits, while recipients do not always declare cashback income, resulting in an imbalance.
Why the Government May Be Prompted to Act
With e-commerce and digital transactions continuing to rise sharply, policymakers see cashbacks not merely as promotional discounts, but as financial transfers with taxable implications. Regulators may now look at:
- Revising the ₹50,000 exemption threshold for individuals
- Introducing TDS obligations on high-value cashback payouts
- Aligning cashback taxation rules with those applicable to other benefits and perquisites
Industry observers note that more precise guidelines would help bridge India’s widening digital tax compliance gap, increase fairness among market participants, and contribute to stable revenue growth for the government.
Conclusion
As India marches toward becoming a $4.43 trillion consumer economy by 2030, digital-led promotional strategies like cashback will continue to play a critical role in e-commerce growth. However, experts say that to sustain this growth responsibly, the government must soon standardize the tax treatment of cashback schemes to ensure transparency, reduce compliance uncertainty, and safeguard public revenue.
Read More: Madras High Court Questions Prolonged GST ITC Blocking Without Adjudication