Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationNo Revision of Customs Entry Required Where Separate Procedure Already Exists for...

No Revision of Customs Entry Required Where Separate Procedure Already Exists for Reversal of Incentive Benefits: CBIC

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) clarified that customs entries will not be required to be revised in cases where any import-related incentive or benefit, already availed under certain foreign trade schemes, is later required to be reversed—provided that a separate and specific reversal mechanism is already available under the relevant notification or regulation. 

The notification has been issued under Section 18A(5)(c) of the Customs Act, 1962, which empowers the government to specify circumstances where revision of entry is not necessary.

According to the notification, no revision of the import entry (such as bills of entry) will be made if the importer has availed benefits under an instrument-based scheme under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, or under any customs exemption notification issued under Section 25(1) of the Customs Act, regulation or notification issued under the Customs Act, or benefit under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975; and a separate procedure for reversal of such benefit already exists.

The existing reversal process will continue to apply, and no amendment to the import declaration will be necessary.

Notification Details

Notification No. 71/2025-Customs (N.T.)

Date: 30/10/2025

Read More: Importer-Exporter, Customs Brokers Can  Now Voluntarily Revise Customs Declarations Post Clearance: CBIC

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 21 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 21, 2026.GSTSUPREME COURT UPHOLDS HC’S REFUSAL...

Serious Investigative Lapses: Supreme Court Orders De Novo Probe Into 2012 Rape-Murder of 17-Year-Old

The Supreme Court has ordered a de novo investigation into the 2012 rape and...

Conflict Between Trade Marks Act S. 134 and Commercial Courts Act on Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench

The Supreme Court has referred to a Larger Bench an important question concerning the...

Supreme Court Clarifies S. 28A Land Acquisition Limitation

The Supreme Court has clarified the scope of Section 28A of the Land Acquisition...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 21 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 21, 2026.GSTSUPREME COURT UPHOLDS HC’S REFUSAL...

Serious Investigative Lapses: Supreme Court Orders De Novo Probe Into 2012 Rape-Murder of 17-Year-Old

The Supreme Court has ordered a de novo investigation into the 2012 rape and...

Conflict Between Trade Marks Act S. 134 and Commercial Courts Act on Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench

The Supreme Court has referred to a Larger Bench an important question concerning the...