Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeDirect TaxBIG BREAKING: ITR Extension Hearing Update — Delhi, Punjab & Haryana, and...

BIG BREAKING: ITR Extension Hearing Update — Delhi, Punjab & Haryana, and Gujarat High Courts in Focus

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The much-anticipated hearing before the Delhi High Court concerning the extension of the due date for filing audited Income Tax Returns (ITRs) has been adjourned to tomorrow at 2:30 PM, keeping taxpayers and professionals across the country on edge as the deadline looms.

Meanwhile, in a significant development, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has recorded a statement made by the Counsel for the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) that the necessary orders regarding the extension of the ITR filing due date are “likely to be issued by October 29, 2025.”

The Court was informed that the matter is “presently under active consideration of the CBDT,” and that “in all probability, the requisite notification/order is expected to be issued by tomorrow.” This statement has provided a glimmer of hope to thousands of Chartered Accountants, tax professionals, and taxpayers who have been demanding an extension due to the ongoing portal issues and heavy compliance load.

Adding to the mounting pressure on the tax authorities, the Gujarat High Court has delivered a key ruling, holding that it is mandatory to provide a one-month gap between the Tax Audit Report submission date and the ITR filing due date.

The bench of Justice Bhargav D. Karia and Justice Pranav Trivedi observed that merely extending the “specified date” for filing the audit report without correspondingly extending the due date for filing the return would be contrary to Explanation (ii) to Section 44AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and against the legislative intent introduced through the Finance Act, 2020.

Accordingly, the Gujarat High Court has directed the CBDT to issue a circular extending the due date for filing returns up to November 30, 2025 for assessees required to furnish an audit report for the Financial Year 2024–25.

With multiple High Courts now addressing the issue, and the Delhi High Court set to resume hearing tomorrow, all eyes are on the CBDT’s official notification, which is expected to settle the uncertainty over the ITR (Audit) deadline extension once and for all.

Read More: 6 Months Bail Granted To Asaram Bapu: Rajasthan HC

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Supreme Court Refuses to Interfere With GST Order Carrying RFN but No Separate DIN or Visible Signature

The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with an Andhra Pradesh High Court ruling...

Negligible Listing and Disposal of GSTAT Appeals: Supreme Court Asks Tribunal President to Examine Grievance

The Supreme Court has disposed of a public interest litigation seeking court-monitored institutional reforms...

Rule 96(10) Deemed Omitted From Inception: Bombay HC Orders Refund of Interest Paid on Import IGST

The Bombay High Court has held that no interest could be levied on the...

Officer Who Conducted GST Audit Can’t Issue Notice and Adjudicate Same Proceedings: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has quashed a GST adjudication order after finding that the...

More like this

Supreme Court Refuses to Interfere With GST Order Carrying RFN but No Separate DIN or Visible Signature

The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with an Andhra Pradesh High Court ruling...

Negligible Listing and Disposal of GSTAT Appeals: Supreme Court Asks Tribunal President to Examine Grievance

The Supreme Court has disposed of a public interest litigation seeking court-monitored institutional reforms...

Rule 96(10) Deemed Omitted From Inception: Bombay HC Orders Refund of Interest Paid on Import IGST

The Bombay High Court has held that no interest could be levied on the...