HomeDirect TaxMedical Expense of Director is an Allowable Business Expenditure in Hands of...

Medical Expense of Director is an Allowable Business Expenditure in Hands of Company: ITAT

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that medical expense of a director is an allowable business expenditure in the hands of the company.

The bench of T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member) and Makarand V.Mahadeokar (Accountant Member) has observed that  reimbursement of medical expenses of a managing director, when duly authorized by Board resolution, is allowable under section 37(1) as expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes.

The appellant/assessee claimed an amount of Rs.1,00,901/- as business expenditure towards reimbursement of medical expenses of one of its directors. The Assessing Officer held that such expenditure was personal in nature and not incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business. Invoking section 37(1), the AO disallowed the claim.

Before the CIT(A), the assessee submitted that the Directors are employees of the company, and reimbursement of medical expenses constitutes part of their remuneration, which is contractually authorizing. It was also submitted that the Board of Directors had passed a resolution authorizing such reimbursement. IT was further submitted that the expenditure was incurred on grounds of commercial expediency since the director was a key managerial person and a driving force behind the company’s business. It was argued that a company, being a juristic person, cannot incur “personal expenses”; therefore, disallowance on that ground was misconceived. Reliance was placed on several judicial precedents before CIT(A).

The CIT(A), however, concurred with the AO’s findings, holding that personal medical expenses of directors do not fall within the ambit of section 37(1) unless covered under a contractual or statutory obligation.

The assessee reiterated the submissions before the CIT(A) and also placed reliance on decision of Co-ordinate Bench in case of Paradeep Oxygen (P) Ltd. v. DCIT, in which  the Co-ordinate Bench held that reimbursement of medical expenses to the managing director, duly authorized by a bona fide Board Resolution, is allowable under section 37(1) as expenditure wholly and exclusively for business purposes.

The tribunal noted that  the assessee has indeed placed on record the copy of the Board Resolution dated 12.04.2011, authorized reimbursement of actual medical expenses incurred by directors. The company, being a juristic person, cannot have personal needs of its own, and once the expenditure is incurred pursuant to a valid resolution of the Board and in discharge of contractual obligation, the same partakes the character of business expenditure. 

Case Details

Case Title: M/s.Roomag Motors & Controls P.Ltd. Versus Dy.CIT

Case No.: ITA No.796/Ahd/2025

Date: 09/09/2025  

Counsel For  Appellant: Tushar Hemani, Sr.Advocate

Counsel For Respondent: Abhijit, Sr. DR

Read More: What to Expect from India’s Final DPDP Rules: Bridging Critical Gaps in the Digital Privacy Framework

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 17 AUGUST, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  August 17, 2026.GSTDELHI HIGH COURT CONDONES 19-DAY...

Investigation Deposit Carries Interest From Date of Deposit, Not Just After 3 Month Refund Period: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad has held that an...

Supreme Court Refers Validity of Arbitration Pre-Deposit Conditions to Larger Bench

The Supreme Court has referred to a larger Bench the contentious question of whether...

Supreme Court Issues These 13 Strict Verification Rules for Foreign Nationals in Commercial-Quantity NDPS Cases

The Supreme Court has cancelled the bail granted to a foreign national accused in...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 17 AUGUST, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  August 17, 2026.GSTDELHI HIGH COURT CONDONES 19-DAY...

Investigation Deposit Carries Interest From Date of Deposit, Not Just After 3 Month Refund Period: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad has held that an...

Supreme Court Refers Validity of Arbitration Pre-Deposit Conditions to Larger Bench

The Supreme Court has referred to a larger Bench the contentious question of whether...