Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeDirect TaxMedical Expense of Director is an Allowable Business Expenditure in Hands of...

Medical Expense of Director is an Allowable Business Expenditure in Hands of Company: ITAT

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that medical expense of a director is an allowable business expenditure in the hands of the company.

The bench of T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member) and Makarand V.Mahadeokar (Accountant Member) has observed that  reimbursement of medical expenses of a managing director, when duly authorized by Board resolution, is allowable under section 37(1) as expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes.

The appellant/assessee claimed an amount of Rs.1,00,901/- as business expenditure towards reimbursement of medical expenses of one of its directors. The Assessing Officer held that such expenditure was personal in nature and not incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business. Invoking section 37(1), the AO disallowed the claim.

Before the CIT(A), the assessee submitted that the Directors are employees of the company, and reimbursement of medical expenses constitutes part of their remuneration, which is contractually authorizing. It was also submitted that the Board of Directors had passed a resolution authorizing such reimbursement. IT was further submitted that the expenditure was incurred on grounds of commercial expediency since the director was a key managerial person and a driving force behind the company’s business. It was argued that a company, being a juristic person, cannot incur “personal expenses”; therefore, disallowance on that ground was misconceived. Reliance was placed on several judicial precedents before CIT(A).

The CIT(A), however, concurred with the AO’s findings, holding that personal medical expenses of directors do not fall within the ambit of section 37(1) unless covered under a contractual or statutory obligation.

The assessee reiterated the submissions before the CIT(A) and also placed reliance on decision of Co-ordinate Bench in case of Paradeep Oxygen (P) Ltd. v. DCIT, in which  the Co-ordinate Bench held that reimbursement of medical expenses to the managing director, duly authorized by a bona fide Board Resolution, is allowable under section 37(1) as expenditure wholly and exclusively for business purposes.

The tribunal noted that  the assessee has indeed placed on record the copy of the Board Resolution dated 12.04.2011, authorized reimbursement of actual medical expenses incurred by directors. The company, being a juristic person, cannot have personal needs of its own, and once the expenditure is incurred pursuant to a valid resolution of the Board and in discharge of contractual obligation, the same partakes the character of business expenditure. 

Case Details

Case Title: M/s.Roomag Motors & Controls P.Ltd. Versus Dy.CIT

Case No.: ITA No.796/Ahd/2025

Date: 09/09/2025  

Counsel For  Appellant: Tushar Hemani, Sr.Advocate

Counsel For Respondent: Abhijit, Sr. DR

Read More: What to Expect from India’s Final DPDP Rules: Bridging Critical Gaps in the Digital Privacy Framework

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Shipping Operator Can’t Claim 60-Day Limit to Charge Demurrage on Goods Seized by Customs: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai Bench held that the...

Rs. 25 Crore Excise Penalty Can’t Rest on Help Procuring Raw Materials Without Proof of Dealing in Confiscable Goods: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, has set aside a...

Mayank Kumar Appointed Member of CBIC [READ OFFICE ORDER]

The Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (ACC) has approved the appointment of Shri Mayank...

Hyderabad DGGI | 60 Days in Jail, Investigation Largely Complete: Telangana High Court

The Telangana High Court has granted bail to a person arrested in a case...

More like this

Shipping Operator Can’t Claim 60-Day Limit to Charge Demurrage on Goods Seized by Customs: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai Bench held that the...

Rs. 25 Crore Excise Penalty Can’t Rest on Help Procuring Raw Materials Without Proof of Dealing in Confiscable Goods: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, has set aside a...

Mayank Kumar Appointed Member of CBIC [READ OFFICE ORDER]

The Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (ACC) has approved the appointment of Shri Mayank...