Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeCompany & PMLASupreme Court to Hear Maintainability of Review Petitions Against PMLA Judgment Upholding...

Supreme Court to Hear Maintainability of Review Petitions Against PMLA Judgment Upholding ED Powers

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court on Thursday began hearing the issue of maintainability of review petitions challenging its landmark 2022 judgment that had upheld the extensive powers of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002.

A three-judge bench comprising Justices Surya Kant, Ujjal Bhuyan, and N. Kotiswar Singh assembled to examine whether the review pleas filed against the earlier verdict could be entertained.

The 2022 judgment, delivered by a bench led by Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, had validated the ED’s wide-ranging powers, including those related to arrest, search, seizure, and attachment of properties, under PMLA. The ruling was seen as a major boost to the agency’s investigative authority but had also drawn criticism from various quarters for its perceived impact on individual liberties and due process.

The review petitions contend that the judgment overlooked critical constitutional safeguards, particularly regarding personal liberty, presumption of innocence, and transparency in ED’s functioning. Petitioners argue that unchecked powers vested in the agency could lead to misuse.

Today’s hearing is confined to determining the maintainability of these review petitions, before the court can proceed to consider them on merits.

The matter is of significant consequence, as the outcome will decide whether challenges to the 2022 verdict can be reopened or whether the judgment remains final.

Read More: GSTAT Issues Advisory on E-Filing of Appeals: Staggered Timelines, Mandatory Offline Preparation & Digital Compliance

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 11 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 11, 2026.GSTMANUFACTURE OR TRADING STATUS IRRELEVANT FOR...

Front-of-Pack Food Warning Labels Must Be Clear, Prominent and Scientifically Justified: Supreme Court Asks FSSAI to Clarify Proposal

The Supreme Court has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI)...

Rs. 22.44 Crore Customs Duty Evasion Case Involving Alleged Routing of Chinese Steel Pipes Through Thailand: Mumbai Court Grants Bail

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Esplanade, Mumbai, has granted bail to a businessman...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 11 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 11, 2026.GSTMANUFACTURE OR TRADING STATUS IRRELEVANT FOR...

Front-of-Pack Food Warning Labels Must Be Clear, Prominent and Scientifically Justified: Supreme Court Asks FSSAI to Clarify Proposal

The Supreme Court has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI)...