Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesSupreme Court Upholds Service Tax on Export Cargo Handling by Airports Authority...

Supreme Court Upholds Service Tax on Export Cargo Handling by Airports Authority of India

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court has ruled that the Airports Authority of India (AAI) is liable to pay service tax on services provided in relation to handling of export cargo at airports, dismissing the Authority’s appeal challenging earlier orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT).

The bench of Justices Pankaj Mithal and Justice Prasanna B. Varale upheld the Delhi Service Tax Commissioner’s 2010 order and subsequent CESTAT ruling that classified the services under “Airport Services” with effect from September 10, 2004, making them taxable under the Finance Act, 1994.

The AAI, a Government of India body under the Ministry of Civil Aviation, manages airports across the country. As part of its functions, it handles cargo, including export consignments, involving activities such as unloading, carting, X-ray checks, and export packing — from acceptance of cargo until it is loaded onto aircraft.

The Service Tax Department had raised a demand for the period October 1, 2003, to March 31, 2007, initially treating such activities as “Storage and Warehousing Services” until September 9, 2004, and thereafter under “Airport Services.”

Challenging this, the AAI argued that export cargo handling is specifically excluded from the definition of “Cargo Handling Services” under Section 65(23) of the Finance Act, 1994, and hence not taxable.

The Court rejected AAI’s arguments, clarifying that Section 65 merely defines various terms, including “cargo handling service,” and its exclusion of export cargo does not automatically exempt such services from taxation. Section 66, the charging section, levies service tax on all “taxable services” defined under Section 65(105). Sub-clause (zzm) of Section 65(105), introduced on September 10, 2004, explicitly covers any service provided by the Airports Authority or any other person at an airport or civil enclave.

Thus, once “airport services” became a taxable category in 2004, all services rendered at airports — including export cargo handling — were liable to service tax.

The Court also dismissed reliance on government circulars by AAI, holding that circulars cannot override express statutory provisions.

The Supreme Court concluded that CESTAT and the Service Tax Commissioner were correct in treating AAI’s export cargo handling as taxable “airport services” from September 10, 2004.

Accordingly, the appeal was dismissed as lacking merit, affirming the tax liability on AAI for the disputed period.

Case Details

Case Title: Airports Authority Of India Versus Commissioner Of Service Tax

Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL NO. 17405/2017

Date: September 23, 2025

Read More: Supreme Court to Hear Maintainability of Review Petitions Against PMLA Judgment Upholding ED Powers

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 11 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 11, 2026.GSTMANUFACTURE OR TRADING STATUS IRRELEVANT FOR...

Front-of-Pack Food Warning Labels Must Be Clear, Prominent and Scientifically Justified: Supreme Court Asks FSSAI to Clarify Proposal

The Supreme Court has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI)...

DRI | 3 Years’ Custody and Slow Trial Alone Can’t Override NDPS Bail Bar in Commercial Quantity Case: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has refused regular bail to a 70-year-old man accused of...

Rs. 22.44 Crore Customs Duty Evasion Case Involving Alleged Routing of Chinese Steel Pipes Through Thailand: Mumbai Court Grants Bail

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Esplanade, Mumbai, has granted bail to a businessman...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 11 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 11, 2026.GSTMANUFACTURE OR TRADING STATUS IRRELEVANT FOR...

Front-of-Pack Food Warning Labels Must Be Clear, Prominent and Scientifically Justified: Supreme Court Asks FSSAI to Clarify Proposal

The Supreme Court has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI)...

DRI | 3 Years’ Custody and Slow Trial Alone Can’t Override NDPS Bail Bar in Commercial Quantity Case: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has refused regular bail to a 70-year-old man accused of...