Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationBREAKING: Nirmala Sitharaman Withdraws Income-Tax Bill, 2025

BREAKING: Nirmala Sitharaman Withdraws Income-Tax Bill, 2025 [READ OFFICIAL DOC]

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a surprise move, the Union Finance Minister Niramala Sithraman has officially withdrawn the much-discussed Income-Tax Bill, 2025, just months after introducing it in the Lok Sabha.

The decision, announced today by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, comes after the Select Committee’s report and additional recommendations from various stakeholders.

The Income-Tax Bill, 2025 was tabled in the Lok Sabha on February 13, 2025 and referred to the Select Committee the same day. The Committee submitted its report on July 21, 2025, with most of its recommendations accepted by the government.

However, the government stated that more corrections were needed — including refining the drafting, aligning phrases, ensuring consequential changes, and better cross-referencing — to ensure clarity in legislative language.

As a result, the current Bill stands withdrawn, and a fresh Bill will soon be introduced in the Lok Sabha to replace the over six-decade-old Income-tax Act, 1961.

The old Income-tax Act, 1961 is still in force for now. The new Bill will likely incorporate all improvements, making it the most significant overhaul of India’s tax law in decades. Taxpayers, businesses, and professionals should gear up for a complete restructuring of income tax provisions.

The move has set off a storm of discussions in financial, corporate, and political circles — with many seeing it as the government’s attempt to “get it absolutely right” before making one of the most critical reforms in India’s tax history.

Read More: GST ITC Allowed on Construction of Concrete Tower for VCV Lines: AAAR Relies on Safari Retreats Judgement

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Absence Of E-Way Bill Can’t Establish Gold Smuggling Without Proof Of Foreign Origin: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad, has held that discrepancies...

Purity Markings, Uncorroborated Retracted Statements Can’t Establish Gold Smuggling: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad, has held that purity...

Purity Markings Alone Can’t Establish Smuggled Foreign Origin of Gold: CESTAT 

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Mere Possession of Large Cash Can’t Prove Sale of Smuggled Gold: CESTAT 

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad w held that the...

More like this

Absence Of E-Way Bill Can’t Establish Gold Smuggling Without Proof Of Foreign Origin: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad, has held that discrepancies...

Purity Markings, Uncorroborated Retracted Statements Can’t Establish Gold Smuggling: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad, has held that purity...

Purity Markings Alone Can’t Establish Smuggled Foreign Origin of Gold: CESTAT 

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...