Indian Diplomatic Missions Owe Over £8.6 Million in London Congestion Charges

Indian diplomatic vehicles have racked up more than £8.6 million in outstanding London congestion charge fees, according to Transport for London (TfL). India trails only the United States and Japan in unpaid congestion tolls, underscoring a long-standing impasse over diplomatic immunity and local laws.

Context: Congestion Charge and Diplomats’ Liability

• London imposes a daily congestion charge of £15, applicable during peak hours in central London, plus fines between £65 and £195 for non-payment.
• Transport for London and the UK government maintain that congestion charges are a fee for a service—not a tax—and diplomats are not exempt from payment.
• Some embassies, including India, contest this, citing the Vienna Convention and arguing the charge constitutes a prohibited local tax under diplomatic immunity.

Extent of the Debt

• Diplomatic missions in London collectively owe over £152 million in congestion charges accumulated from 2003 to September 2024.
• The US Embassy leads with approximately £15 million, followed by India (£8.6 m), Japan (£10.1 m), China, and Saudi Arabia.

Parking Fines and Enforcement Challenges

• Diplomatic vehicles have also incurred a rising number of parking fines on London’s red routes—roads vital to traffic and emergency services.
• Between 2021 and 2024, over 1,780 parking penalty charges were issued to diplomatic vehicles, totaling fines exceeding £200,000. Outstanding sums currently stand around £15,000.
• While diplomats are technically immune from process, TfL insists that the charges should still apply, though enforcement is limited.

Government Response & Diplomatic Tensions

• The UK Foreign Office has issued letters to multiple missions urging payment and has pursued diplomatic engagement to resolve overdue charges.
• London’s mayor and authorities have highlighted that some embassies still refuse to comply, prompting debate over potential measures like impounding vehicles or escalating to international courts.

Why This Issue Matters

• This ongoing dispute raises serious questions about the limits of diplomatic immunity, especially concerning routine public fees and civic responsibility.
• It also reflects the inequity felt by London taxpayers when diplomatic missions benefit from city services without paying their share.
• With governments and TfL acknowledging the issue publicly, it remains unclear whether diplomatic inertia or international legal norms will prevail.

Summary at a Glance

Read More: Supreme Court Overrules High Court’s Bail Condition Requiring Man to Resume Marital Relations