Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesValuation Of Imported Goods Falls Outside The Purview Of High Court's Jurisdiction:...

Valuation Of Imported Goods Falls Outside The Purview Of High Court’s Jurisdiction: Calcutta High Court 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Calcutta High Court dismissed an appeal filed by the Commissioner of Customs (Port), Kolkata against Supreme Petrochem Ltd., ruling that the issue raised — concerning the valuation of imported goods — falls outside the purview of the High Court’s jurisdiction under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962.

The bench of Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam and Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das) held that any question directly linked to the rate of duty or valuation of goods is specifically barred from being heard under Section 130(1) of the Act. As such, the appeal was deemed not maintainable.

The Department had challenged an order passed by the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata Bench, dated November 21, 2024. It argued that the importer had allegedly evaded customs duty by under-declaring freight charges while importing goods classified under Customs Tariff Item No. 29025000. According to the Department, this omission resulted in an incorrect determination of the assessable value under Section 14 of the Act, read with Rule 10(2) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007.

“The issue raised in this appeal by the revenue concerns the valuation of the goods in question. Therefore, there is a clear embargo in entertaining this appeal by this Court,” the Bench stated while dismissing the matter.

The Court left the substantial questions of law proposed by the Department open, clarifying that it may explore other remedies available under the law.

The Court also directed the return of the original certified copy of the Tribunal’s impugned order to the Department’s advocate after retaining a photocopy.

Case Details

Case Title: The Commissioner Of Customs (Port), Kolkata Vs. M/S. Supreme Petrochem Ltd.

Case No.: CUSTA/19/2025 IA No. GA/1/2025

Date:  2nd July, 2025

Counsel For  Petitioner: Uday Sankar Bhattacharya

Counsel For Respondent: Jitendra Motwani

Read More: GST Council Meet May Push for Higher Sin Taxes on Tobacco, Sugary Foods and UPFs

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Without Arrest  – A Tiger That Can Only Roar

This Article pertaining to “GST Without Arrest   - A Tiger That Can Only Roar” is written...

Rs. 1.88 Crore Tax Addition Falls As Scrutiny Notice Was Issued By Officer Without Jurisdiction: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed an assessment...

GSTN Issues GST Reform FAQs Explain Rs. 10K Notice Threshold, Arrest Removal Proposal And Faster Refunds

A detailed FAQ document on the 57th GST Council’s recommendations explains a wide-ranging reform...

GST E-Invoicing Set To Cover RCM Self-Invoices For Taxpayers With ₹5 Crore Turnover; Sandbox Testing Enabled: GSTN

The Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) has announced system enhancements to enable e-invoicing...

More like this

GST Without Arrest  – A Tiger That Can Only Roar

This Article pertaining to “GST Without Arrest   - A Tiger That Can Only Roar” is written...

Rs. 1.88 Crore Tax Addition Falls As Scrutiny Notice Was Issued By Officer Without Jurisdiction: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed an assessment...

GSTN Issues GST Reform FAQs Explain Rs. 10K Notice Threshold, Arrest Removal Proposal And Faster Refunds

A detailed FAQ document on the 57th GST Council’s recommendations explains a wide-ranging reform...