Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeCompany & PMLAKerala High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to ED Officer in Rs. 2...

Kerala High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to ED Officer in Rs. 2 Crore Bribery Case

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Kerala High Court granted anticipatory bail to Enforcement Directorate (ED) officer Shekhar Kumar, who is facing serious corruption charges in a case registered by the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (VACB), Ernakulam unit.

A bench of Justice A. Badharudeen has allowed the bail application.

Shekhar Kumar, currently serving as Assistant Director at the ED’s Kochi office, was accused of demanding a bribe of ₹2 crore from a businessman under investigation. The anticipatory bail was granted by Justice A Badharudeen.

Kumar has been named as the prime accused in the case, which involves allegations of bribery under Section 7(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and criminal conspiracy under Section 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).

The case emerged after a man claiming to be an ED agent was caught red-handed while accepting ₹2 lakh from a businessman, Aneesh Babu, who is under the ED scanner for his involvement in cashew trading operations. In his complaint, Babu alleged that the total bribe demand amounted to ₹2 crore in exchange for dropping the case against him.

Besides Kumar, three other individuals were named in the FIR. They were arrested but later released on bail by a Vigilance Court, which observed that the reasons for their arrest were not adequately communicated.

In his bail plea, Kumar denied all allegations and maintained that he had no connection with the co-accused. He asserted that the charges were a malicious attempt by the complainant to obstruct the ED’s ongoing investigation. He further claimed that Babu had been evading law enforcement for several years and was now fabricating the bribery allegation to avoid prosecution.

“It would be a travesty of justice if the applicant, a public servant with an unblemished service record, is subjected to arrest and incarceration based on unverified claims,” Kumar stated in his plea.

Case Details

Case Title: Shekhar Kumar v. State of Kerala 

Case No: BA No. 6918 of 2025

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Importer’s Consent to Enhanced Customs Value Doesn’t Bar Appeal; Valuation Must Follow Statutory Procedure: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad Bench, has held that...

Adjudicating Authority Ignored Remand Directions, Reissued ‘Copy-Paste’ Order: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand 

The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

RP Extinguishing Pre-CIRP MVAT Dues Bars Tax Recovery: Bombay HC Orders Refund of Rs. 20.02 Lakh Pre-Deposit

The Bombay High Court has held that once a resolution plan is approved by...

Statutory Return Periodicity Can’t Be Altered by Tax Dept: Bombay HC Quashes Rs. 1.27 Crore MVAT Interest Demand Against Microsoft

The Bombay High Court has set aside the levy of substantial interest under Section...

More like this

Importer’s Consent to Enhanced Customs Value Doesn’t Bar Appeal; Valuation Must Follow Statutory Procedure: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad Bench, has held that...

Adjudicating Authority Ignored Remand Directions, Reissued ‘Copy-Paste’ Order: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand 

The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

RP Extinguishing Pre-CIRP MVAT Dues Bars Tax Recovery: Bombay HC Orders Refund of Rs. 20.02 Lakh Pre-Deposit

The Bombay High Court has held that once a resolution plan is approved by...