Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTMeerut Court Approves Judicial Custody of Accused in ₹10.85 Crore GST Fraud...

Meerut Court Approves Judicial Custody of Accused in ₹10.85 Crore GST Fraud Case

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Special Chief Judicial Magistrate’s Court in Meerut has ordered judicial custody of a person accused of a massive Rs. 10.85 crore tax evasion case under the CGST Act, 2017.

The accused was booked under Sections 132(1)(b), 132(1)(c), and 132(1)(i) by the Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI), RZU Ghaziabad.

The person was accused of playing a key role in orchestrating fraudulent GST activities.

During the hearing, Special Public Prosecutor Lakshay Kumar Singh delivered blazing arguments, exposing Guma’s pivotal role in the tax fraud.

Convinced by the prosecution’s strong presentation of facts and the serious financial nature of the offense, the court granted the request for 14-day judicial custody. The accused will remain lodged in Meerut District Jail until July 4, 2025.

The court emphasized the grave nature of the crime, which involves fraudulent claims and evasion amounting to over Rs. 10.85 crore, and observed that custodial interrogation and judicial oversight were necessary.

Authorities have been instructed to ensure the presence of the accused on the next hearing date via video conferencing.

Read More: Government May Allow SEZ Units to Sell in India by Paying Only Input Duty

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Commissioner’s Approval Can’t Override Rs. 20 Lakh Appeal Limit: GSTAT Dismisses Dept.’s Penalty Appeal

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), State Bench at Ghaziabad, has dismissed...

Defective GST Notice Can’t Sustain Rs. 2.50 Crore Recredit Demand: GSTAT Orders Reconciliation Of Tax Paid Under Wrong Head

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ghaziabad State Bench, has set aside...

Exempt Cattle Feed Sales Alone Doesn’t Warrant ITC Reversal; Common Credit Must Be Verified: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chandigarh State Bench, has held that...

GSTAT Denies 0.1% Export Concession For Drums Sent To Distilleries, Grants Partial Relief From S. 74

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chandigarh, has held that HDPE drums...

More like this

Commissioner’s Approval Can’t Override Rs. 20 Lakh Appeal Limit: GSTAT Dismisses Dept.’s Penalty Appeal

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), State Bench at Ghaziabad, has dismissed...

Defective GST Notice Can’t Sustain Rs. 2.50 Crore Recredit Demand: GSTAT Orders Reconciliation Of Tax Paid Under Wrong Head

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ghaziabad State Bench, has set aside...

Exempt Cattle Feed Sales Alone Doesn’t Warrant ITC Reversal; Common Credit Must Be Verified: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chandigarh State Bench, has held that...