Service Tax Weekly Flashback for the period from 22 to 28 June 2025.

Patna High Court

Rs. 38.79 Crore Service Tax Demand for Charging Centage Without Providing Direct Construction Services Upheld: Patna High court

The Patna High Court has dismissed a writ petition filed by Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Limited (BRPNNL), a state-owned infrastructure company, challenging a demand of Rs. 38.79 crore in service tax along with interest and penalty for the financial years 2015-16 to 2017-18.

Chhattisgarh High Court

Service Tax Demand On Mandap Keeper Quashed: Chhattisgarh HC Finds Key Documents Were Not Relied Upon, Orders Fresh Adjudication

The Chhattisgarh High Court has quashed the service tax demand on mandap keeper as the key documents were not relied upon and required fresh adjudication.

CESTAT

Relief To Air India | Data Ownership Key to OIDAR Taxability: CESTAT

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that services received by Air India Ltd. from foreign-based Computer Reservation System (CRS) companies are not taxable under the category of Online Information and Database Access or Retrieval (OIDAR) services.

Service Tax Demand on Stock Broker’s Delayed Payment Charges Quashed: CESTAT

The Delhi bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has ruled in favour of SMC Global Securities Ltd., setting aside a demand of over Rs. 5.7 crore in service tax on “Delayed Payment Charges” (DPC) levied on clients who defaulted in timely payments for securities transactions.

Construction Firm Denied Rs. 5.92 Crore Service Tax Refund Filed Beyond 6 Month Limitation Period: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has allowed appeals filed by the Department against a construction company’s Rs. 5.92 crore service tax refund as the claim was filed beyond the six-month limitation period prescribed under Section 102 of the Finance Act, 2016.

Subcontractors Must Pay Service Tax Independently — Main Contractor’s Payment Not a Shield: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has upheld the service tax demands raised against subcontractors for failing to discharge service tax liabilities for construction services provided between FY 2012–13 and 2016–17.

Juris Hour Team
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Mutual Funds That Have Majority Stakes In Tesla Stock​ – 2025

How Tesla’s Top Mutual Fund Investors Influence Indian Portfolios Through International FoFs, ETFs, and Direct Investing Routes

CA Ritesh Arora’s GST Gavel is the Litigator’s New Bible

In a time when GST litigation and indirect tax jurisprudence are becoming…

CBIC Appoints Common Adjudicating Authority for Bando India Pvt Ltd Customs Cases

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has appointed a…

Top Ways a New Chartered Accountant Can Start Earning Money in 2025

Just became a Chartered Accountant? Discover 7 practical and profitable ways to…