Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeCase CompilationService Tax Weekly Flashback: 22 To 28 June 2025

Service Tax Weekly Flashback: 22 To 28 June 2025

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Service Tax Weekly Flashback for the period from 22 to 28 June 2025.

Patna High Court

Rs. 38.79 Crore Service Tax Demand for Charging Centage Without Providing Direct Construction Services Upheld: Patna High court

The Patna High Court has dismissed a writ petition filed by Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Limited (BRPNNL), a state-owned infrastructure company, challenging a demand of Rs. 38.79 crore in service tax along with interest and penalty for the financial years 2015-16 to 2017-18.

Chhattisgarh High Court

Service Tax Demand On Mandap Keeper Quashed: Chhattisgarh HC Finds Key Documents Were Not Relied Upon, Orders Fresh Adjudication

The Chhattisgarh High Court has quashed the service tax demand on mandap keeper as the key documents were not relied upon and required fresh adjudication.

CESTAT

Relief To Air India | Data Ownership Key to OIDAR Taxability: CESTAT

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that services received by Air India Ltd. from foreign-based Computer Reservation System (CRS) companies are not taxable under the category of Online Information and Database Access or Retrieval (OIDAR) services.

Service Tax Demand on Stock Broker’s Delayed Payment Charges Quashed: CESTAT

The Delhi bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has ruled in favour of SMC Global Securities Ltd., setting aside a demand of over Rs. 5.7 crore in service tax on “Delayed Payment Charges” (DPC) levied on clients who defaulted in timely payments for securities transactions.

Construction Firm Denied Rs. 5.92 Crore Service Tax Refund Filed Beyond 6 Month Limitation Period: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has allowed appeals filed by the Department against a construction company’s Rs. 5.92 crore service tax refund as the claim was filed beyond the six-month limitation period prescribed under Section 102 of the Finance Act, 2016.

Subcontractors Must Pay Service Tax Independently — Main Contractor’s Payment Not a Shield: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has upheld the service tax demands raised against subcontractors for failing to discharge service tax liabilities for construction services provided between FY 2012–13 and 2016–17.

Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour is an online news portal for reporting accurate and honest news, articles, judgments, Circulars, orders and notifications related to legal developments. We use the tagline ‘Proficiency At Your Doorstep’. Our mission is to simplify and communicate various legal developments in various spheres like civil, criminal, taxation, etc. and make people aware of their rights and duties in order to empower them to contribute in nation-building.Juris Hour is a team of young professionals turned legal journalists who are guided by the values enshrined in the Preamble of the Constitution of India and want to create more legal awareness in society by acting as a tool to aid legal reforms by offering a space for constructive criticism of the judiciary.

Latest articles

10% Stamp Duty Valuation Tolerance Applies To AY 2018-19: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted an addition...

IBC Appeal Filed Without Delay-Condonation Plea Cannot Escape 45-Day Limit: NCLAT Dismisses ED’s Appeal

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has dismissed an...

Cash Advance From Selling House To Repay Housing Loan: ITAT Deletes Penalty

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Chennai, has deleted a ₹26 lakh penalty imposed...

Rs. 11,000 Crore Customs Demand: Volkswagen Cites Five-Year Limit, Centre Alleges Delayed Disclosure Before Bombay High Court

The Centre has defended its approximately ₹11,000 crore customs duty demand against Volkswagen before...

More like this

10% Stamp Duty Valuation Tolerance Applies To AY 2018-19: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted an addition...

IBC Appeal Filed Without Delay-Condonation Plea Cannot Escape 45-Day Limit: NCLAT Dismisses ED’s Appeal

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has dismissed an...

Cash Advance From Selling House To Repay Housing Loan: ITAT Deletes Penalty

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Chennai, has deleted a ₹26 lakh penalty imposed...